Literature DB >> 24186673

Acetabular bone density and metal ions after metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty; short-term results.

Wierd P Zijlstra1, Hugo C van der Veen, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Mark J M Zee, Sjoerd K Bulstra, Jos J A M van Raay.   

Abstract

Information on periprosthetic acetabular bone density is lacking for metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties. These bearings use cobalt-chromium instead of titanium acetabular components, which could lead to stress shielding and hence periprosthetic bone loss. Cobalt and chromium ions have detrimental effects on bone. It is unknown whether serum metal ion levels affect bone density clinically. We compared cementless large femoral head (mean 48 mm) metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (M2a-Magnum, Biomet) to cementless 28 mm metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties (Mallory-Head, Biomet) in a randomised clinical trial. We evaluated periprosthetic acetabular bone density and serum metal ion levels at 1 year postoperatively. Acetabular bone density was analyzed with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in four horizontal regions of interest in 70 patients. After one year, acetabular bone density decreased (-3.5% to -7.8%) in three of four regions of interest in metal-on-polyethylene patients, but was retained in metal-on-metal patients. Bone density preservation was most pronounced superior to the metal-on-metal cup (+1% versus -3.7%). Serum cobalt, chromium and titanium ion levels were not related to bone density, nor to acetabular inclination or femoral head size. Oxford and Harris hip scores were similar in both groups. Contrary to our hypothesis, acetabular bone density was retained with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, compared to metal-on-polyethylene arthroplasty. Bone preservation was most pronounced in the area superior to the cup. This could be a benefit during future revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24186673     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  4 in total

1.  Use of internal references for assessing CT density measurements of the pelvis as replacement for use of an external phantom.

Authors:  Martijn F Boomsma; Inge Slouwerhof; Jorn A van Dalen; Mireille A Edens; Dirk Mueller; Julien Milles; Mario Maas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Bone loss of the superior adjacent vertebral body immediately posterior to the anterior flange of Bryan cervical disc.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Kim; Young Sun Chung; Alexander E Ropper; Kyung Hoon Min; Tae Keun Ahn; Keun Soo Won; Dong Ah Shin; In Bo Han
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Yin; Dangfeng Zhang; Hui Du; Heng Du; Zhanhai Yin; Yusheng Qiu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 4.  Increased Mortality in Metal-on-Metal versus Non-Metal-on-Metal Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty at 10 Years and Longer Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  B G Pijls; J M T A Meessen; J W Schoones; M Fiocco; H J L van der Heide; A Sedrakyan; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.