OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of individual comorbid conditions as well as the weight assignment, predictive properties and discriminating power of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: A prospective multicentre observational study (AMIS Plus Registry) from 69 Swiss hospitals with 29 620 ACS patients enrolled from 2002 to 2012. The main outcome measures were in-hospital and 1-year follow-up mortality. RESULTS:Of the patients, 27% were female (age 72.1 ± 12.6 years) and 73% were male (64.2 ± 12.9 years). 46.8% had comorbidities and they were less likely to receive guideline-recommended drug therapy and reperfusion. Heart failure (adjusted OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.57 to 2.25), metastatic tumours (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.60 to 3.19), renal diseases (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.60 to 2.11) and diabetes (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.54) were strong predictors of in-hospital mortality. In this population, CCI weighted the history of prior myocardial infarction higher (1 instead of -0.4, 95% CI -1.2 to 0.3 points) but heart failure (1 instead of 3.7, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.7) and renal disease (2 instead of 3.5, 95% CI 2.7 to 4.4) lower than the benchmark, where all comorbidities, age and gender were used as predictors. However, the model with CCI and age has an identical discrimination to this benchmark (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were both 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities greatly influenced clinical presentation, therapies received and the outcome of patients admitted with ACS. Heart failure, diabetes, renal disease or metastatic tumours had a major impact on mortality. CCI seems to be an appropriate prognostic indicator for in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in ACS patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01305785.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of individual comorbid conditions as well as the weight assignment, predictive properties and discriminating power of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: A prospective multicentre observational study (AMIS Plus Registry) from 69 Swiss hospitals with 29 620 ACS patients enrolled from 2002 to 2012. The main outcome measures were in-hospital and 1-year follow-up mortality. RESULTS: Of the patients, 27% were female (age 72.1 ± 12.6 years) and 73% were male (64.2 ± 12.9 years). 46.8% had comorbidities and they were less likely to receive guideline-recommended drug therapy and reperfusion. Heart failure (adjusted OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.57 to 2.25), metastatic tumours (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.60 to 3.19), renal diseases (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.60 to 2.11) and diabetes (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.54) were strong predictors of in-hospital mortality. In this population, CCI weighted the history of prior myocardial infarction higher (1 instead of -0.4, 95% CI -1.2 to 0.3 points) but heart failure (1 instead of 3.7, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.7) and renal disease (2 instead of 3.5, 95% CI 2.7 to 4.4) lower than the benchmark, where all comorbidities, age and gender were used as predictors. However, the model with CCI and age has an identical discrimination to this benchmark (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were both 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities greatly influenced clinical presentation, therapies received and the outcome of patients admitted with ACS. Heart failure, diabetes, renal disease or metastatic tumours had a major impact on mortality. CCI seems to be an appropriate prognostic indicator for in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in ACS patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01305785.
Authors: Sahereh Mirzaei; Larisa Burke; Anne G Rosenfeld; Susan Dunn; Jennifer R Dungan; Katherine Maki; Holli A DeVon Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: K Renerts; K Fischer; B Dawson-Hughes; E J Orav; G Freystaetter; H-P Simmen; H-C Pape; A Egli; R Theiler; H A Bischoff-Ferrari Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Alvaro Lorente-Ros; Juan Manuel Monteagudo Ruiz; Luis M Rincón; Rodrigo Ortega Pérez; Sonia Rivas; Rafael Martínez-Moya; Maria Ascensión Sanromán; Luis Manzano; Gonzalo Luis Alonso; Borja Ibáñez; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Richard Ofori-Asenso; Ella Zomer; Ken Lee Chin; Peter Markey; Si Si; Zanfina Ademi; Andrea J Curtis; Sophia Zoungas; Danny Liew Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2019-06
Authors: Larisa A Burke; Anne G Rosenfeld; Mohamud R Daya; Karen M Vuckovic; Jessica K Zegre-Hemsey; Maria Felix Diaz; Josemare Tosta Daiube Santos; Sahereh Mirzaei; Holli A DeVon Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Shane Shahrestani; Alexander M Ballatori; Xiao T Chen; Andy Ton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kristin Weeks; Charles F Lynch; Michele West; Ryan Carnahan; Michael O'Rorke; Jacob Oleson; Megan McDonald; Sherri L Stewart; Mary Charlton Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 5.482