Literature DB >> 24186352

The occurrence of photoinhibition in an over-wintering crop of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) and its correlation with changes in crop growth.

P K Farage1, S P Long.   

Abstract

The maximum quantum yield of CO2 uptake (Φ), as a measure of light-limited photosynthetic efficiency, of a Brassica napus crop was measured on most days from mid-October until mid-April. During the winter, Φ was decreased by up to 50%. From January to March, leaves exposed to direct sunlight on days with minimum air temperatures near or below 0° C showed significant reductions in Φ. However, control leaves, artificially shaded from direct sunlight on these days, did not show any decrease. This provides statistical evidence for a light-dependent inhibition of CO2 uptake in the field, termed here photoinhibition. Recovery of Φ during warmer interludes was slow, requiring approx. 2-3 d. Concurrent measurements of light interception by the crop canopy and dry-matter accumulation showed that the efficiency with which intercepted light was converted into dry matter varied, declin between January and March to 33% of the value recorded in the warmer autumn months. Conversion efficiency was significantly and positively correlated with quantum yield. In a closed crop canopy during winter, light will be limiting for photosynthesis for much of the time. Under these conditions depression of Φ at the leaf level may contribute significantly to decreased dry-matter accumulation at the crop level, since the light-limited rate of CO2 uptake is likely to govern canopy photosynthetic rate.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 24186352     DOI: 10.1007/BF00194071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  7 in total

1.  Estimation of the effect of photoinhibition on the carbon gain in leaves of a willow canopy.

Authors:  E Ogren; M Sjöström
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Freezing damage and frost tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus studied with isolated mesophyll protoplasts of Valerianella locusta L.

Authors:  S Rumich-Bayer; G H Krause
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Quantum Yields for CO(2) Uptake in C(3) and C(4) Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO(2), and O(2) Concentration.

Authors:  J Ehleringer; O Björkman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Inactivation of the photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle in isolated mesophyll protoplasts subjected to freezing stress.

Authors:  S Rumich-Bayer; C Giersch; G H Krause
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Photoinhibition at chilling temperature : Fluorescence characteristics of unhardened and cold-acclimated spinach leaves.

Authors:  S Somersalo; G H Krause
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Effects of low night temperature and light on chlorophyll fluorescence of field-grown seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.).

Authors:  M Strand; T Lundmark
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact bean leaves: role of light and temperature, and requirement for chloroplast-protein synthesis during recovery.

Authors:  D H Greer; J A Berry; O Björkman
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.116

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Assessing photosynthetic downregulation in sunflower stands with an optically-based model.

Authors:  J A Gamon; C B Field; A L Fredeen; S Thayer
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Photoinhibition as a control on photosynthesis and production of Sphagnum mosses.

Authors:  K J Murray; J D Tenhunen; R S Nowak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Does triacylglycerol (TAG) serve a photoprotective function in plant leaves? An examination of leaf lipids under shading and drought.

Authors:  Renée M Marchin; Tarryn L Turnbull; Audrey I Deheinzelin; Mark A Adams
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.500

Review 4.  Multiple feedbacks between chloroplast and whole plant in the context of plant adaptation and acclimation to the environment.

Authors:  Barbara Demmig-Adams; Jared J Stewart; William W Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  On the significance of photoinhibition of photosynthesis in the field and its generality among species.

Authors:  E Ogren; E Rosenqvist
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Photosystem II efficiency and mechanisms of energy dissipation in iron-deficient, field-grown pear trees (Pyrus communis L.).

Authors:  F Morales; R Belkhodja; A Abadía; J Abadía
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Chilling and photosynthetic productivity of field grown maize (Zea mays); changes in the parameters of the light-response curve, canopy leaf CO2 assimilation rate and crop radiation-use efficiency.

Authors:  C M Stirling; V H Rodrigo; J Emberru
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  May photoinhibition be a consequence, rather than a cause, of limited plant productivity?

Authors:  William W Adams; Onno Muller; Christopher M Cohu; Barbara Demmig-Adams
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Identification of genomic loci associated with 21chlorophyll fluorescence phenotypes by genome-wide association analysis in soybean.

Authors:  Matthew Herritt; Arun Prabhu Dhanapal; Larry C Purcell; Felix B Fritschi
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Antisense reductions in the PsbO protein of photosystem II leads to decreased quantum yield but similar maximal photosynthetic rates.

Authors:  Simon A Dwyer; Wah Soon Chow; Wataru Yamori; John R Evans; Sarah Kaines; Murray R Badger; Susanne von Caemmerer
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.