Literature DB >> 24186158

Chloroplast DNA as an evolutionary marker in thePhaseolus vulgaris complex.

V Llaca1, A Delgado Salinas, P Gepts.   

Abstract

We have analyzed the changes occurring in the chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) of taxa belonging to thePhaseolus vulgaris complex to help clarify relationships among species of this complex. Two restriction maps for 11 restriction enzymes comprising the whole chloroplast genome from a wildP. vulgaris and a wildP. coccineus accession were constructed. These maps allowed us to compare a total of 330 restriction sites between the two genomes in order to identify polymorphisms, assess the type of mutations detected, and identify regions of high variability. A region, located in the large single-copy region near the borders with the inverted repeats, accounted for a large portion of the variation. Most of the mutations detected were due to restriction sites gains or losses. Variable and conserved regions were then evaluated in 30 accessions belonging to taxa of theP. vulgaris complex. Phylogenetic analyses were made using parsimony methods. Conclusions obtained from such analyses were the following: (1) there was high cpDNA variability withinP. coccineus but not inP. vulgaris. (2)P. coccineus subsp.glabellus showed a very distinct cpDNA type that strongly suggests that it actually belongs to a different but as yet undetermined section of the genus. Our cpDNA observations are supported by distinctive morphological traits and reproductive biology of this taxon. (3) InP. coccineus subsp.darwinianus (also classified asP. polyanthus), the cpDNA lineage was in disagreement with data obtained from nuclear markers and suggested a reticulated origin by hybridization betweenP. coccineus as the male parent and an ancestralP. polyanthus type, closely allied toP. vulgaris, as the seed parent. This initial cross was presumably followed by repeated backcrossing toP. coccineus. Our cpDNA studies illustrate the importance of molecular markers in elucidating phylogenetic relationships. They also indicate that accurate phylogenies will require analyses of both nuclear and cytoplasmic genomes.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24186158     DOI: 10.1007/BF01253966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  14 in total

1.  Mitochondrial genome size variation and restriction fragment length polymorphisms in threePhaseolus species.

Authors:  M M Khairallah; M W Adams; B B Sears
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I.

Authors:  P W Rigby; M Dieckmann; C Rhodes; P Berg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-06-15       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  EXPERIMENTAL INTROGRESSION IN THE GENUS PHASEOLUS. I. EFFECT OF MATING SYSTEMS ON INTERSPECIFIC GENE FLOW.

Authors:  J R Wall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Comparative organization of chloroplast genomes.

Authors:  J D Palmer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Clone banks of the mung bean, pea and spinach chloroplast genomes.

Authors:  J D Palmer; W F Thompson
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.

Authors:  A P Feinberg; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Interspecific hybridization of phaseolus vulgaris with P. lunatus and P. acutifolius.

Authors:  D W Mok; M C Mok; A Rabakoarihanta
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Divergence of chloroplast gene organization in three legumes: Pisum sativum, Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  E J Crouse; M Mubumbila; B M Stummann; G Bookjans; C Michalowski; H J Bohnert; J H Weil; K W Henningsen
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Analyses of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus Lam. hybrids by RFLP: preferential transmission of P. vulgaris alleles.

Authors:  M Guo; D A Lightfoot; M C Mok; D W Mok
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Embryo development in reciprocal crosses of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus Lam.

Authors:  C T Shii; A Rabakoarihanta; M C Mok; D W Mok
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genetic diversity and structure of a worldwide collection of Phaseolus coccineus L.

Authors:  G Spataro; B Tiranti; P Arcaleni; E Bellucci; G Attene; R Papa; P Spagnoletti Zeuli; V Negri
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  AFLP studies on downy-mildew-resistant and downy-mildew-susceptible genotypes of opium poppy.

Authors:  Mukesh K Dubey; Ajit K Shasany; Om P Dhawan; Ashutosh K Shukla; Suman P S Khanuja
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Genetic diversity and population structure of an Italian landrace of runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.): inferences for its safeguard and on-farm conservation.

Authors:  F Mercati; G Catarcione; A R Paolacci; M R Abenavoli; F Sunseri; M Ciaffi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Origin of year-long bean (Phaseolus dumosus Macfady, Fabaceae) from reticulated hybridization events between multiple Phaseolus species.

Authors:  Angela M Mina-Vargas; Peter C McKeown; Nicola S Flanagan; Daniel G Debouck; Andrzej Kilian; Trevor R Hodkinson; Charles Spillane
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Development of four phylogenetically-arrayed BAC libraries and sequence of the APA locus in Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  James Kami; Valérie Poncet; Valérie Geffroy; Paul Gepts
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genomic history of the origin and domestication of common bean unveils its closest sister species.

Authors:  Martha Rendón-Anaya; Josaphat M Montero-Vargas; Soledad Saburido-Álvarez; Anna Vlasova; Salvador Capella-Gutierrez; José Juan Ordaz-Ortiz; O Mario Aguilar; Rosana P Vianello-Brondani; Marta Santalla; Luis Delaye; Toni Gabaldón; Paul Gepts; Robert Winkler; Roderic Guigó; Alfonso Delgado-Salinas; Alfredo Herrera-Estrella
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  European Phaseolus coccineus L. landraces: population structure and adaptation, as revealed by cpSSRs and phenotypic analyses.

Authors:  Monica Rodriguez; Domenico Rau; Simonetta A Angioi; Elisa Bellucci; Elena Bitocchi; Laura Nanni; Helmut Knüpffer; Valeria Negri; Roberto Papa; Giovanna Attene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Chloroplast Microsatellite Diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  F Desiderio; E Bitocchi; E Bellucci; D Rau; M Rodriguez; G Attene; R Papa; L Nanni
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.