Literature DB >> 24186101

Predicting preterm birth in women with previous preterm birth and cervical length ≥ 25 mm.

A G Care1, A N Sharp, S Lane, D Roberts, L Watkins, Z Alfirevic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors predicting subsequent spontaneous preterm birth or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) in a cohort of women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth and a cervical length of ≥ 25 mm at 20-24 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: We identified all pregnant women who attended our preterm labor clinic between January 2010 and December 2012 because of previous spontaneous preterm birth or PPROM before 34 weeks. Women with a normal cervical length (defined as ≥ 25 mm) between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation were identified and included in the analysis. Maternal characteristics, obstetric history, shortest cervical length and gestational age at shortest cervical length of women who delivered preterm (before 37 weeks) were compared with those who delivered at or after 37 weeks in the index pregnancy. Multiple regression analysis was planned to examine the relationship between significant clinical and cervical-length variables to identify significant clinical predictors of spontaneous preterm birth among high-risk patients with a normal cervix between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: Of 134 women with a normal cervix at 20-24 weeks, 28 (20.9%) delivered spontaneously or had PPROM before 37 weeks; of these 12 (9.0%) delivered before 34 weeks. None of the selected explanatory variables was predictive of recurrent preterm birth in this cohort. No correlation between absolute cervical length and gestational age at delivery was found (R = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: In high-risk women with a cervical length of ≥ 25 mm at 20-24 weeks' gestation, demographic characteristics and absolute cervical length are not useful in predicting subsequent spontaneous preterm birth.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervix; prediction; pregnancy; preterm birth; transvaginal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24186101     DOI: 10.1002/uog.13241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

1.  Probing the potential of mucus permeability to signify preterm birth risk.

Authors:  K B Smith-Dupont; C E Wagner; J Witten; K Conroy; H Rudoltz; K Pagidas; V Snegovskikh; M House; K Ribbeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Mid-Trimester Cervical Consistency Index and Cervical Length to Predict Spontaneous Preterm Birth in a High-Risk Population.

Authors:  Núria Baños; Carla Julià; Núria Lorente; Silvia Ferrero; Teresa Cobo; Eduard Gratacos; Montse Palacio
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-03-19

3.  Using an innovative stacked ensemble algorithm for the accurate prediction of preterm birth

Authors:  Pari Ramalingam; Maheshwari Sandhya; Sharmila Sankar
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-12-03

Review 4.  Gut and Reproductive Tract Microbiota Adaptation during Pregnancy: New Insights for Pregnancy-Related Complications and Therapy.

Authors:  Martina De Siena; Lucrezia Laterza; Maria Valeria Matteo; Irene Mignini; Tommaso Schepis; Gianenrico Rizzatti; Gianluca Ianiro; Emanuele Rinninella; Marco Cintoni; Antonio Gasbarrini
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-02-25

5.  Maternal Whole Blood Gene Expression at 18 and 28 Weeks of Gestation Associated with Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Asymptomatic Women.

Authors:  Yujing J Heng; Craig E Pennell; Sheila W McDonald; Angela E Vinturache; Jingxiong Xu; Mary W F Lee; Laurent Briollais; Andrew W Lyon; Donna M Slater; Alan D Bocking; Lawrence de Koning; David M Olson; Siobhan M Dolan; Suzanne C Tough; Stephen J Lye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Courtney Phillips; Zain Velji; Ciara Hanly; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.