Bogdan Draganski1, Antoine Lutti, Ferath Kherif. 1. aLREN, Département des neurosciences cliniques - CHUV, University Lausanne, Switzerland bMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We present an overview of recent concepts in mechanisms underlying cognitive decline associated with brain aging and neurodegeneration from the perspective of MRI. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings challenge the established link between neuroimaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration and age-related or disease-related cognitive decline. Amyloid burden, white matter hyperintensities and local patterns of brain atrophy seem to have differential impact on cognition, particularly on episodic and working memory - the most vulnerable domains in 'normal aging' and Alzheimer's disease. Studies suggesting that imaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration are independent of amyloid-β give rise to new hypothesis regarding the pathological cascade in Alzheimer's disease. Findings in patients with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease confirm the notion of differential temporal trajectory of amyloid deposition and brain atrophy to add another layer of complexity on the basic mechanisms of cognitive aging and neurodegeneration. Finally, the concept of cognitive reserve in 'supernormal aging' is questioned by evidence for the preservation of neurochemical, structural and functional brain integrity in old age rather than recruitment of 'reserves' for maintaining cognitive abilities. SUMMARY: Recent advances in clinical neuroscience, brain imaging and genetics challenge pathophysiological hypothesis of neurodegeneration and cognitive aging dominating the field in the last decade and call for reconsidering the choice of therapeutic window for early intervention.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We present an overview of recent concepts in mechanisms underlying cognitive decline associated with brain aging and neurodegeneration from the perspective of MRI. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings challenge the established link between neuroimaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration and age-related or disease-related cognitive decline. Amyloid burden, white matter hyperintensities and local patterns of brain atrophy seem to have differential impact on cognition, particularly on episodic and working memory - the most vulnerable domains in 'normal aging' and Alzheimer's disease. Studies suggesting that imaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration are independent of amyloid-β give rise to new hypothesis regarding the pathological cascade in Alzheimer's disease. Findings in patients with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease confirm the notion of differential temporal trajectory of amyloid deposition and brain atrophy to add another layer of complexity on the basic mechanisms of cognitive aging and neurodegeneration. Finally, the concept of cognitive reserve in 'supernormal aging' is questioned by evidence for the preservation of neurochemical, structural and functional brain integrity in old age rather than recruitment of 'reserves' for maintaining cognitive abilities. SUMMARY: Recent advances in clinical neuroscience, brain imaging and genetics challenge pathophysiological hypothesis of neurodegeneration and cognitive aging dominating the field in the last decade and call for reconsidering the choice of therapeutic window for early intervention.
Authors: Jessica A Ash; Hanbing Lu; Lisa R Taxier; Jeffrey M Long; Yihong Yang; Elliot A Stein; Peter R Rapp Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sarah Genon; Tobias Wensing; Andrew Reid; Felix Hoffstaedter; Svenja Caspers; Christian Grefkes; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat; Simon B Eickhoff Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Rachel E Thayer; Sophie L YorkWilliams; Kent E Hutchison; Angela D Bryan Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Antonio M Chiarelli; Mark A Fletcher; Chin Hong Tan; Kathy A Low; Edward L Maclin; Benjamin Zimmerman; Tania Kong; Alexander Gorsuch; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Rachel E Thayer; Sarah L Hagerty; Amithrupa Sabbineni; Eric D Claus; Kent E Hutchison; Barbara J Weiland Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Danielle N Davis; Morgan D Strong; Emily Chambers; Matthew D Hart; Ahmed Bettaieb; Stephen L Clarke; Brenda J Smith; Barbara J Stoecker; Edralin A Lucas; Dingbo Lin; Winyoo Chowanadisai Journal: Gene Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.913