BACKGROUND: Individuals may compensate for exercise training by modifying nonexercise behavior (ie, increase sedentary time (ST) and decrease nonexercise physical activity [NEPA]). PURPOSE: To compare ST and NEPA during a 12-week exercise training and/or lifestyle intervention. METHODS:Fifty-seven overweight/obese participants (19 M/39 F) completed the study (mean ± SD; age 43.6 ± 9.9 y, BMI 35.1 ± 4.6 kg/m2). There were no between-group differences in activity levels at baseline. Four-arm quasi-experimental intervention study 1) EX: exercise 5 days per week at a moderate intensity (40% to 65% VO2peak) 2) rST: reduce ST and increase NEPA, 3) EX-rST: combination of EX and rST and 4) CON: maintain habitual behavior. RESULTS: For the EX group, ST did not decrease significantly (mean ((95% confidence interval) 0.48 (-2.2 to 3.1)% and there was no changes in NEPA at week-12 compared with baseline. The changes were variable, with approximately 50% of participants increasing ST and decreasing NEPA. The rST group decreased ST (-4.8 (0.8 to 7.9)% and increased NEPA. EX-rST significantly decreased ST (-5.1 (-2.2 to 7.9)% and increased time in NEPA at week-12 compared with baseline. The control group increased ST by 4.3 (0.8 to 7.9)%. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in nonexercise ST and NEPA are variable among participants in an exercise-training program, with nearly half decreasing NEPA compared with baseline. Interventions targeting multiple behaviors (ST and NEPA) may effectively reduce compensation and increase daily activity.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Individuals may compensate for exercise training by modifying nonexercise behavior (ie, increase sedentary time (ST) and decrease nonexercise physical activity [NEPA]). PURPOSE: To compare ST and NEPA during a 12-week exercise training and/or lifestyle intervention. METHODS: Fifty-seven overweight/obeseparticipants (19 M/39 F) completed the study (mean ± SD; age 43.6 ± 9.9 y, BMI 35.1 ± 4.6 kg/m2). There were no between-group differences in activity levels at baseline. Four-arm quasi-experimental intervention study 1) EX: exercise 5 days per week at a moderate intensity (40% to 65% VO2peak) 2) rST: reduce ST and increase NEPA, 3) EX-rST: combination of EX and rST and 4) CON: maintain habitual behavior. RESULTS: For the EX group, ST did not decrease significantly (mean ((95% confidence interval) 0.48 (-2.2 to 3.1)% and there was no changes in NEPA at week-12 compared with baseline. The changes were variable, with approximately 50% of participants increasing ST and decreasing NEPA. The rST group decreased ST (-4.8 (0.8 to 7.9)% and increased NEPA. EX-rST significantly decreased ST (-5.1 (-2.2 to 7.9)% and increased time in NEPA at week-12 compared with baseline. The control group increased ST by 4.3 (0.8 to 7.9)%. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in nonexercise ST and NEPA are variable among participants in an exercise-training program, with nearly half decreasing NEPA compared with baseline. Interventions targeting multiple behaviors (ST and NEPA) may effectively reduce compensation and increase daily activity.
Authors: Mary O Whipple; Erica N Schorr; Kristine M C Talley; Ruth Lindquist; Ulf G Bronas; Diane Treat-Jacobson Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Haocheng Li; Yukun Zhang; Raymond J Carroll; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Joshua N Sampson; Charles E Matthews Journal: Stat Med Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Sarah Kozey Keadle; Joshua N Sampson; Haocheng Li; Kate Lyden; Charles E Matthews; Raymond J Carroll Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Edward Melanson; Sarah Kozy Keadle; Joseph E Donnelly; Barry Braun; Neal A King Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Sarah Kozey Keadle; Kate Lyden; John Staudenmayer; Amanda Hickey; Richard Viskochil; Barry Braun; Patty S Freedson Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 2.665