Literature DB >> 24184437

Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia.

Vitor C Zimmerer1, Patricia E Cowell2, Rosemary A Varley3.   

Abstract

One factor in syntactic impairment in aphasia might be damage to general structure processing systems. In such a case, deficits would be evident in the processing of syntactically structured non-linguistic information. To explore this hypothesis, we examined performances on artificial grammar learning (AGL) tasks in which the grammar was expressed in non-linguistic visual forms. In the first experiment, AGL behavior of four aphasic participants with severe syntactic impairment, five aphasic participants without syntactic impairment, and healthy controls was examined. Participants were trained on sequences of nonsense stimuli with the structure A(n)B(n). Data were analyzed at an individual level to identify different behavioral profiles and account for heterogeneity in aphasic as well as healthy groups. Healthy controls and patients without syntactic impairment were more likely to learn configurational (item order) than quantitative (counting) regularities. Quantitative regularities were only detected by individuals who also detected the configurational properties of the stimulus sequences. By contrast, two individuals with syntactic impairment learned quantitative regularities, but showed no sensitivity towards configurational structure. They also failed to detect configurational structure in a second experiment in which sequences were structured by the grammar A(+)B(+). We discuss the potential relationship between AGL and processing of word order as well as the potential of AGL in clinical practice.
© 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrammatism; Aphasia; Artificial grammar learning; Syntax

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24184437     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  Grammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming.

Authors:  Soojin Cho-Reyes; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia: evidence from artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2017-02-17

3.  Implicit learning and implicit treatment outcomes in individuals with aphasia.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Michaela Nerantzini; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Syntax Acquisition in Healthy Adults and Post-Stroke Individuals: The Intriguing Role of Grammatical Preference, Statistical Learning, and Education.

Authors:  Simon Kirsch; Carolin Elser; Elena Barbieri; Dorothee Kümmerer; Cornelius Weiller; Mariacristina Musso
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Labels, cognomes, and cyclic computation: an ethological perspective.

Authors:  Elliot Murphy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-03

6.  More than one way to see it: Individual heuristics in avian visual computation.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Gesche Westphal-Fitch; Ulrike Aust; Martin M Schlumpp; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  Artificial grammar learning in vascular and progressive non-fluent aphasias.

Authors:  Thomas E Cope; Benjamin Wilson; Holly Robson; Rebecca Drinkall; Lauren Dean; Manon Grube; P Simon Jones; Karalyn Patterson; Timothy D Griffiths; James B Rowe; Christopher I Petkov
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Evolutionarily conserved neural signatures involved in sequencing predictions and their relevance for language.

Authors:  Yukiko Kikuchi; William Sedley; Timothy D Griffiths; Christopher I Petkov
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.