Literature DB >> 24184342

Development and validation of an unsupervised scoring system (Autonomate) for skin conductance response analysis.

Steven R Green1, Philip A Kragel2, Matthew E Fecteau3, Kevin S LaBar4.   

Abstract

The skin conductance response (SCR) is increasingly being used as a measure of sympathetic activation concurrent with neuroscience measurements. We present a method of automated analysis of SCR data in the contexts of event-related cognitive tasks and nonspecific responding to complex stimuli. The primary goal of the method is to accurately measure the classical trough-to-peak amplitude of SCR in a fashion closely matching manual scoring. To validate the effectiveness of the method in event-related paradigms, three archived datasets were analyzed by two manual raters, the fully-automated method (Autonomate), and three alternative software packages. Further, the ability of the method to score non-specific responses to complex stimuli was validated against manual scoring. Results indicate high concordance between fully-automated and computer-assisted manual scoring methods. Given that manual scoring is error prone, subject to bias, and time consuming, the automated method may increase the efficiency and accuracy of SCR data analysis.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomic nervous system; Computer-assisted scoring; Electrodermal activity; Psychophysiology; Skin conductance response; Sympathetic arousal

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24184342      PMCID: PMC3943713          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  18 in total

1.  Separating individual skin conductance responses in a short interstimulus-interval paradigm.

Authors:  D M Alexander; C Trengove; P Johnston; T Cooper; J P August; E Gordon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Confidence in Altman-Bland plots: a critical review of the method of differences.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.557

3.  Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in electrodermal research: a study in the context of the orienting response.

Authors:  R J Barry
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Elicitation and habituation of the electrodermal orienting response in a short interstimulus interval paradigm.

Authors:  R J Barry; S Feldmann; E Gordon; K I Cocker; C Rennie
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity.

Authors:  Mathias Benedek; Christian Kaernbach
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Delayed extinction attenuates conditioned fear renewal and spontaneous recovery in humans.

Authors:  Nicole C Huff; Jose Alba Hernandez; Nineequa Q Blanding; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Fear relevancy, strategy use, and probabilistic learning of cue-outcome associations.

Authors:  Laura A Thomas; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and amygdala volumes.

Authors:  Rajendra A Morey; Christopher M Petty; Yuan Xu; Jasmeet Pannu Hayes; H Ryan Wagner; Darrell V Lewis; Kevin S LaBar; Martin Styner; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Generalization of conditioned fear along a dimension of increasing fear intensity.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Stephen R Mitroff; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Time-series analysis for rapid event-related skin conductance responses.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Guillaume Flandin; Karl J Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  27 in total

1.  Proximal threats promote enhanced acquisition and persistence of reactive fear-learning circuits.

Authors:  Leonard Faul; Daniel Stjepanović; Joshua M Stivers; Gregory W Stewart; John L Graner; Rajendra A Morey; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stress promotes generalization of older but not recent threat memories.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; A Ross Otto; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Variability in emotional responsiveness and coping style during active avoidance as a window onto psychological vulnerability to stress.

Authors:  Adam X Gorka; Kevin S LaBar; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-02-26

4.  Generalization of conditioned fear along a dimension of increasing positive valence.

Authors:  Mason McClay; Augustin C Hennings; Alex Reidel; Joseph E Dunsmoor
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Threat intensity widens fear generalization gradients.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Marijn C W Kroes; Stephen H Braren; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Role of Human Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Learning and Recall of Enhanced Extinction.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Marijn C W Kroes; Jian Li; Nathaniel D Daw; Helen B Simpson; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Emotional learning selectively and retroactively strengthens memories for related events.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Vishnu P Murty; Lila Davachi; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Discriminative Fear Learners are Resilient to Temporal Distortions during Threat Anticipation.

Authors:  Jessica I Lake; Warren H Meck; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Timing Time Percept       Date:  2016

9.  Eye-Movement Intervention Enhances Extinction via Amygdala Deactivation.

Authors:  Lycia D de Voogd; Jonathan W Kanen; David A Neville; Karin Roelofs; Guillén Fernández; Erno J Hermans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Thought suppression inhibits the generalization of fear extinction.

Authors:  Augustin C Hennings; Sophia A Bibb; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Joseph E Dunsmoor
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.