| Literature DB >> 24184184 |
J Ryding1, E Hjertberg, B B Rasmussen.
Abstract
Characterizing anti-drug antibodies for neutralizing activity is commonly part of the immunogenicity testing package for most therapeutic proteins. Cell-based neutralization assays can generally be categorized as direct- or indirect assays depending on whether they are associated with therapeutics with agonistic- or antagonistic properties. This paper's aim is a comparison of the two direct neutralization assay formats; the variable- and fixed concentration assay format, using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone as drug agonist. Essential validation- and performance parameters, such as sample through-put, cut-point, precision, sensitivity and drug tolerance, were compared. The fixed concentration assay format offers superior sample through-put (40 versus 6 samples), precision (coefficient of variation of ≤14% versus 34%) and almost 6 times better sensitivity and is generally recommended as the better option particularly for quasi-quantitative assessments of neutralizing antibodies.Keywords: Antibodies; Bioassay; Cell-based; EC50; FSH; Format; NAb; NC; Neutralizing; PC LOW; RLU; cAMP; cyclic adenosine monophosphate; effective concentration at 50%.; human follicle-stimulating hormone; low positive control; negative control; recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone; relative light units; rhFSH
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24184184 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.10.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Methods ISSN: 0022-1759 Impact factor: 2.303