Literature DB >> 24184174

Musical training generalises across modalities and reveals efficient and adaptive mechanisms for reproducing temporal intervals.

David Aagten-Murphy1, Giulia Cappagli2, David Burr3.   

Abstract

Expert musicians are able to time their actions accurately and consistently during a musical performance. We investigated how musical expertise influences the ability to reproduce auditory intervals and how this generalises across different techniques and sensory modalities. We first compared various reproduction strategies and interval length, to examine the effects in general and to optimise experimental conditions for testing the effect of music, and found that the effects were robust and consistent across different paradigms. Focussing on a 'ready-set-go' paradigm subjects reproduced time intervals drawn from distributions varying in total length (176, 352 or 704 ms) or in the number of discrete intervals within the total length (3, 5, 11 or 21 discrete intervals). Overall, Musicians performed more veridical than Non-Musicians, and all subjects reproduced auditory-defined intervals more accurately than visually-defined intervals. However, Non-Musicians, particularly with visual stimuli, consistently exhibited a substantial and systematic regression towards the mean interval. When subjects judged intervals from distributions of longer total length they tended to regress more towards the mean, while the ability to discriminate between discrete intervals within the distribution had little influence on subject error. These results are consistent with a Bayesian model that minimizes reproduction errors by incorporating a central tendency prior weighted by the subject's own temporal precision relative to the current distribution of intervals. Finally a strong correlation was observed between all durations of formal musical training and total reproduction errors in both modalities (accounting for 30% of the variance). Taken together these results demonstrate that formal musical training improves temporal reproduction, and that this improvement transfers from audition to vision. They further demonstrate the flexibility of sensorimotor mechanisms in adapting to different task conditions to minimise temporal estimation errors.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multisensory; Music; Temporal reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24184174     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  8 in total

1.  Sensorimotor integration is enhanced in dancers and musicians.

Authors:  Falisha J Karpati; Chiara Giacosa; Nicholas E V Foster; Virginia B Penhune; Krista L Hyde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Exploring the reciprocal modulation of time and space in dancers and non-dancers.

Authors:  Barbara Magnani; Massimiliano Oliveri; Francesca Frassinetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Authors:  Aurelio Bruno; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-19

4.  Shifting the paradigm of music instruction: implications of embodiment stemming from an augmented reality guitar learning system.

Authors:  Joseph R Keebler; Travis J Wiltshire; Dustin C Smith; Stephen M Fiore; Jeffrey S Bedwell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27

5.  Time and distance estimation in children using an egocentric navigation task.

Authors:  Kay Thurley; Ulrike Schild
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Unimodal and cross-modal prediction is enhanced in musicians.

Authors:  Eliana Vassena; Katty Kochman; Julie Latomme; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Sensorimotor Grounding of Musical Embodiment and the Role of Prediction: A Review.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan Maes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-04

8.  Central tendency effects in time interval reproduction in autism.

Authors:  Themelis Karaminis; Guido Marco Cicchini; Louise Neil; Giulia Cappagli; David Aagten-Murphy; David Burr; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.