Literature DB >> 24183964

Heterogeneity in the spatial receptive field architecture of multisensory neurons of the superior colliculus and its effects on multisensory integration.

D Ghose1, M T Wallace2.   

Abstract

Multisensory integration has been widely studied in neurons of the mammalian superior colliculus (SC). This has led to the description of various determinants of multisensory integration, including those based on stimulus- and neuron-specific factors. The most widely characterized of these illustrate the importance of the spatial and temporal relationships of the paired stimuli as well as their relative effectiveness in eliciting a response in determining the final integrated output. Although these stimulus-specific factors have generally been considered in isolation (i.e., manipulating stimulus location while holding all other factors constant), they have an intrinsic interdependency that has yet to be fully elucidated. For example, changes in stimulus location will likely also impact both the temporal profile of response and the effectiveness of the stimulus. The importance of better describing this interdependency is further reinforced by the fact that SC neurons have large receptive fields, and that responses at different locations within these receptive fields are far from equivalent. To address these issues, the current study was designed to examine the interdependency between the stimulus factors of space and effectiveness in dictating the multisensory responses of SC neurons. The results show that neuronal responsiveness changes dramatically with changes in stimulus location - highlighting a marked heterogeneity in the spatial receptive fields of SC neurons. More importantly, this receptive field heterogeneity played a major role in the integrative product exhibited by stimulus pairings, such that pairings at weakly responsive locations of the receptive fields resulted in the largest multisensory interactions. Together these results provide greater insight into the interrelationship of the factors underlying multisensory integration in SC neurons, and may have important mechanistic implications for multisensory integration and the role it plays in shaping SC-mediated behaviors.
Copyright © 2013 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LEDs; SC; SOAs; SRF; STRFs; cross-modal; im; interdependency; intramuscularly; inverse effectiveness; light-emitting diodes; mean statistical contrast; msc; principles of integration; spatial receptive field; spatiotemporal receptive fields; stimulus onset asynchronies; superior colliculus; visual–auditory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183964      PMCID: PMC3878431          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  92 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The influence of visual and auditory receptive field organization on multisensory integration in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  D C Kadunce; J W Vaughan; M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  THE ROLE OF THE SUPERIOR COLLICULUS IN VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  J M SPRAGUE; T H MEIKLE
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Orientation bias of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  E L Smith; Y M Chino; W H Ridder; K Kitagawa; A Langston
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial structure of cone inputs to receptive fields in primate lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  R C Reid; R M Shapley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of visual orienting responses.

Authors:  J M Sprague
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Spatiotemporal structure of visual receptive fields in macaque superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jan Churan; Daniel Guitton; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Visual receptive field properties of neurons in the superficial superior colliculus of the mouse.

Authors:  Lupeng Wang; Rashmi Sarnaik; Krsna Rangarajan; Xiaorong Liu; Jianhua Cang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Multisensory integration produces an initial response enhancement.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rowland; Barry E Stein
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-30
View more
  7 in total

1.  Stimulus intensity modulates multisensory temporal processing.

Authors:  Juliane Krueger Fister; Ryan A Stevenson; Aaron R Nidiffer; Zachary P Barnett; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace; Ryan A Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Deficits in audiovisual speech perception in normal aging emerge at the level of whole-word recognition.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Caitlin E Nelms; Sarah H Baum; Lilia Zurkovsky; Morgan D Barense; Paul A Newhouse; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 4.  Behavioral, perceptual, and neural alterations in sensory and multisensory function in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sarah H Baum; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  A novel behavioral paradigm to assess multisensory processing in mice.

Authors:  Justin K Siemann; Christopher L Muller; Gary Bamberger; John D Allison; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Individual Differences in Multisensory Interactions:The Influence of Temporal Phase Coherence and Auditory Salience on Visual Contrast Sensitivity.

Authors:  Hiu Mei Chow; Xenia Leviyah; Vivian M Ciaramitaro
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05

7.  Frontal and parietal background connectivity and their dynamic changes account for individual differences in the multisensory representation of peripersonal space.

Authors:  Stefania Della Penna; Francesca Ferri; Sara Spadone; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Giulio Di Cosmo; Marcello Costantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.