Literature DB >> 24183748

ACR appropriateness criteria imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Karin E Dill1, Elizabeth George, Suhny Abbara, Kristopher Cummings, Christopher J Francois, Marie D Gerhard-Herman, Heather L Gornik, Michael Hanley, Sanjeeva P Kalva, Jacobo Kirsch, Christopher M Kramer, Bill S Majdalany, John M Moriarty, Isabel B Oliva, Matthew P Schenker, Richard Strax, Frank J Rybicki.   

Abstract

Although aortic valve replacement is the definitive therapy for severe aortic stenosis, almost half of patients with severe aortic stenosis are unable to undergo conventional aortic valve replacement because of advanced age, comorbidities, or prohibitive surgical risk. Treatment options have been recently expanded with the introduction of catheter-based implantation of a bioprosthetic aortic valve, referred to as transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Because this procedure is characterized by lack of exposure of the operative field, image guidance plays a critical role in preprocedural planning. This guideline document evaluates several preintervention imaging examinations that focus on both imaging at the aortic valve plane and planning in the supravalvular aorta and iliofemoral system. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appropriateness criteria; aortic valve stenosis; computed tomographic angiography; echocardiography; magnetic resonance angiography; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183748     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

1.  Pericardial effusion following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: echocardiography and multi-detector row computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  Spyridon Katsanos; Philippe van Rosendael; Vasileios Kamperidis; Frank van der Kley; Madelien Regeer; Ibtihal Al-Amri; Ioannis Karalis; Meindert Palmen; Arend de Weger; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Andreas A Giannopoulos; Dimitris Mitsouras; Shi-Joon Yoo; Peter P Liu; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Rare complication of circumflex artery occlusion during transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Authors:  Chirojit Mukherjee; Joergen Banusch; Joerg Ender
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation.

Authors:  K von Aspern; B Foldyna; C D Etz; A Hoyer; F Girrbach; D Holzhey; C Lücke; M Grothoff; A Linke; F W Mohr; M Gutberlet; L Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  The Polish Interventional Cardiology TAVI Survey (PICTS): adoption and practice of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Poland.

Authors:  Radosław Parma; Maciej Dąbrowski; Andrzej Ochała; Adam Witkowski; Dariusz Dudek; Zbigniew Siudak; Jacek Legutko
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 1.426

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.