Literature DB >> 24183491

Comparison of temporal artery to mercury and digital temperature measurement in pediatrics.

Ayşegül Işler1, Resmiye Aydin2, Serife Tutar Güven3, Sema Günay2.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the temporal artery thermometer measurements with the mercury and digital axillary thermometer measurements in children.
METHODS: This study was conducted at the Pediatric Emergency Department of Akdeniz University Hospital over a three-month period in Turkey. The sample for the study comprised 218 children (aged 0-18years). Three different methods were applied to each patient at the same time. After acquiring necessary institutional permission to conduct the study, the informed consent to participate was obtained from parents before the subjects were included in the study. The data were evaluated using general linear models. The differences between the groups were analyzed by Least Significant Difference method.
RESULTS: The average temperature measured by temporal artery, mercury and digital thermometers were 38.9°C, 38.3°C and 38°C respectively.
CONCLUSION: Temporal artery thermometer values might be considered as core temperature. Rectal temperature is about 2°F (1°C) higher than an axillary temperature. In our study the difference between the temperature measured values was found to be consistent with the range provided in the literature. Temporal artery thermometers are recommended especially pediatric emergency settings, where an accurate, quick and safe body temperature measurement is of vital importance.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183491     DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2013.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 1878-013X            Impact factor:   2.142


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of thermal screening in detection of COVID-19 among truck drivers at Mutukula Land Point of Entry, Uganda.

Authors:  Andrew Nsawotebba; Ivan Ibanda; Isaac Ssewanyana; Patrick Ogwok; Francis Ocen; Christopher Okiira; Atek Kagirita; Dennis Mujuni; Didas Tugumisirize; Joel Kabugo; Abdunoor Nyombi; Robert Kaos Majwala; Bernard Ssentalo Bagaya; Simeon Kalyesubula-Kibuuka; Willy Ssengooba; Susan Nabadda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Assessment of axillary temperature for the evaluation of normal body temperature of healthy young adults at rest in a thermoneutral environment.

Authors:  Shuri Marui; Ayaka Misawa; Yuki Tanaka; Kei Nagashima
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 3.  The diagnostic accuracy of digital, infrared and mercury-in-glass thermometers in measuring body temperature: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valentina Pecoraro; Davide Petri; Giorgio Costantino; Alessandro Squizzato; Lorenzo Moja; Gianni Virgili; Ersilia Lucenteforte
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Forehead or ear temperature measurement cannot replace rectal measurements, except for screening purposes.

Authors:  Christian Backer Mogensen; Lena Wittenhoff; Gitte Fruerhøj; Stephen Hansen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.