Literature DB >> 24183398

Gender disparity in subcortical encoding of binaurally presented speech stimuli: an auditory evoked potentials study.

Mohsen Ahadi1, Akram Pourbakht2, Amir Homayoun Jafari3, Zahra Shirjian4, Amir Salar Jafarpisheh4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of gender on subcortical representation of speech acoustic parameters where simultaneously presented to both ears.
METHODS: Two-channel speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses were obtained in 25 female and 23 male normal hearing young adults by using binaural presentation of the 40 ms synthetic consonant-vowel/da/, and the encoding of the fast and slow elements of speech stimuli at subcortical level were compared in the temporal and spectral domains between the sexes using independent sample, two tailed t-test.
RESULTS: Highly detectable responses were established in both groups. Analysis in the time domain revealed earlier and larger Fast-onset-responses in females but there was no gender related difference in sustained segment and offset of the response. Interpeak intervals between Frequency Following Response peaks were also invariant to sex. Based on shorter onset responses in females, composite onset measures were also sex dependent. Analysis in the spectral domain showed more robust and better representation of fundamental frequency as well as the first formant and high frequency components of first formant in females than in males.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical, biological and biochemical distinctions between females and males could alter the neural encoding of the acoustic cues of speech stimuli at subcortical level. Females have an advantage in binaural processing of the slow and fast elements of speech. This could be a physiological evidence for better identification of speaker and emotional tone of voice, as well as better perceiving the phonetic information of speech in women.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brainstem response; Brain stem; Gender; Speech

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183398     DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx        ISSN: 0385-8146            Impact factor:   1.863


  6 in total

1.  Comparing Sound-Field Speech-Auditory Brainstem Response Components between Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Recognition in Noise Scores.

Authors:  Farnoush Jarollahi; Ayub Valadbeigi; Bahram Jalaei; Mohammad Maarefvand; Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy; Hamid Haghani; Zahra Shirzhiyzn
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2022-03-14

2.  Sound-Field Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Cochlear-Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Farnoush Jarollahi; Ayub Valadbeigi; Bahram Jalaei; Mohammad Maarefvand; Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy; Hamid Haghani; Zahra Shirzhiyan
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2019-12-20

3.  Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Arzu Kırbac; Meral Didem Turkyılmaz; Süha Yağcıoglu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 4.  Parameters for Applying the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential with Speech Stimulus: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luísa Bello Gabriel; Luíza Silva Vernier; Maria Inês Dornelles da Costa Ferreira; Adriana Laybauer Silveira; Márcia Salgado Machado
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-28

5.  Gender differences in binaural speech-evoked auditory brainstem response: are they clinically significant?

Authors:  Bahram Jalaei; Mohd Hafiz Afifi Mohd Azmi; Mohd Normani Zakaria
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-17

6.  Dietary fat intake and risk of disabling hearing impairment: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Humberto Yévenes-Briones; Francisco Félix Caballero; Ellen A Struijk; Alberto Lana; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Esther Lopez-Garcia
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.