Literature DB >> 24183338

Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study.

Marc Ruel1, Masood A Shariff2, Harry Lapierre3, Nikhil Goyal2, Carole Dennie3, Scott M Sadel2, Benjamin Sohmer3, Joseph T McGinn2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and widely applicable, and may be associated with fewer transfusions and infections, and better recovery than standard coronary artery bypass grafting. However, graft patency rates remain unknown. The Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patency Study prospectively evaluated angiographic graft patency 6 months after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
METHODS: In this dual-center study, 91 patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a 4- to 7-cm left thoracotomy approach. The left internal thoracic artery, the ascending aorta for proximal anastomoses, and all coronary targets were directly accessed without endoscopic or robotic assistance. The study primary outcome was graft patency at 6 months, using 64-slice computed tomography angiography. Secondary outcomes included conversions to sternotomy and major adverse cardiovascular events (Clinical Trial Registration Unique identifier: NCT01334866).
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 64 ± 8 years, the mean ejection fraction was 51% ± 11%, and there were 10 female patients (11%) in the study. Surgeries were performed entirely off-pump in 68 patients (76%). Complete revascularization was achieved in all patients, and the median number of grafts was 3. There was no perioperative mortality, no conversion to sternotomy, and 2 reopenings for bleeding. Transfusion occurred in 24 patients (26%). The median length of hospital stay was 4 days, and all patients were followed to 6 months, with no mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events. Six-month computed tomography angiographic graft patency was 92% for all grafts and 100% for left internal thoracic artery grafts.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is safe, feasible, and associated with excellent outcomes and graft patency at 6 months post-surgery.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  23.1; 23.2; 28; 36.1; CABG; CAD; CCS; CTA; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; LAD; LITA; MICS; MIDCAB; SVG; computed tomography angiography; coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary artery disease; left anterior descending; left internal thoracic artery; minimally invasive cardiac surgery; minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass; saphenous vein graft

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183338     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac surgery 2014 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Constanze Strüning; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Ilija Valchanov; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery?

Authors:  Maria Rodriguez; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Mahmoud Diab; Christoph Sponholz; Michael Bauer; Gloria Färber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Minimally invasive total arterial off-pump coronary revascularization: A reproducible technique.

Authors:  Sathyaki Nambala
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.332

5.  Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of triple vessel coronary artery disease with coexisting coronary artery fistula.

Authors:  Harsha Goutham; Sathyaki Nambala; Arul Furtado; Dharmesh Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Xiaolong Ma; Qingyu Kong; Wei Xiao; Jiaji Liu; Liqun Chi; Junming Zhu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-06

7.  Repeat Revascularization Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Traditional Sternotomy Techniques in 1468 Cases.

Authors:  Peter Olson; Michael Cinelli; Hamfreth S Rahming; Thomas Vazzana; Jonathan Spagnola; Emad Barsoum; Marc Assaad; Frank Tamburrino; James Lafferty
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-06

8.  The future of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Bobby Yanagawa; Rashmi Nedadur; John D Puskas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Review of Contemporary Techniques for Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularization.

Authors:  Ali Fatehi Hassanabad; Jimmy Kang; Andrew Maitland; Corey Adams; William D T Kent
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Additional right-sided upper "Half-Mini-Thoracotomy" for aortocoronary bypass grafting during minimally invasive multivessel revascularization.

Authors:  Hug Aubin; Payam Akhyari; Artur Lichtenberg; Alexander Albert
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.