Literature DB >> 24183277

Comparison of ultrasonic shears and traditional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy: randomized controlled trial.

Alison Louise Fitz-Gerald1, Jason Tan, Kok-Weng Chan, Alex Polyakov, Geoff N Edwards, Haider Najjar, Jim Tsaltas, Beverley Vollenhoven.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative analgesia, and length of hospital stay using ultrasonic shears vs traditional suture ligature in vaginal hysterectomy.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
SETTING: Gynecology units within a single health network, university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty women requiring vaginal hysterectomy because of benign disease.
INTERVENTIONS: Vaginal hysterectomy performed using either ultrasonically activated shears (USS) or traditional suture ligatures.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were randomized to the USS arm, and 19 patients to the traditional suture ligature arm. Patient characteristics were comparable. Mean (SD) hysterectomy time and was similar in both the USS and traditional arms, 28.66 (4.0) minutes vs 32.37 (3.18) minutes (p = .47), as was total operating time, 97.38 (8.9) minutes vs 91.63 (7.69) minutes (p = .63). Operative blood loss was significantly decreased in the USS group: 62.63 (12.46) mL vs 136.05 (21.54) mL (p = .006). There was, however, no significant change in hemoglobin concentration between the 2 groups: 19.53 (1.79) g/L vs -16.72 (2.5) g/L. There was no significant difference in mean oxycodone use: 9.29 (2.66) mg vs 8.06 (3.19) mg (p = .77). Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups: 58.98 (3.27) hours vs 60.05 (6.48) hours (p = .88). There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Although the Harmonic scalpel system, compared with the traditional suture ligation method, seems to be a safe alternative for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy, it offers no benefit insofar as operative time, reduction in clinically significant blood loss, and analgesic requirements.
Copyright © 2013 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasonic shears; Vaginal hysterectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183277     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  3 in total

1.  A randomized phase II study of the clinical effects of ultrasonically activated coagulating shears (Harmonic scalpel) in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ryohei Kawabata; Shuji Takiguchi; Yutaka Kimura; Hiroshi Imamura; Junya Fujita; Shigeyuki Tamura; Kazumasa Fujitani; Kentaro Kishi; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Shinichi Fujiwara; Yukinori Kurokawa; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Hemostasis with the Ultrasonic Scalpel.

Authors:  Claudio Peixoto Crispi; Claudio Peixoto Crispi; Paulo Sergio da Silva Reis; Fernando Luis Fernandes Mendes; Marina Mattos Filgueiras; Marlon de Freitas Fonseca
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  Procedure costs associated with the use of Harmonic devices compared to conventional techniques in various surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Jeffrey W Clymer; Rana A Qadeer; Nicole Ferko; Behnam Sadeghirad; Chris G Cameron; Joseph F Amaral
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-07-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.