Literature DB >> 24183273

Analysis of adverse events with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.

Zain A Al-Safi1, Valerie I Shavell, Deslyn T G Hobson, Jay M Berman, Michael P Diamond.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database may be useful for clinicians using a Food and Drug Administration-approved medical device to identify the occurrence of adverse events and complications. We sought to analyze and investigate reports associated with the Essure hysteroscopic sterilization system (Conceptus Inc., Mountain View, CA) using this database.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database for events related to Essure hysteroscopic sterilization from November 2002 to February 2012 (Canadian Task Force Classification III).
SETTING: Online retrospective review. PATIENTS: Online reports of patients who underwent Essure tubal sterilization. INTERVENTION: Essure tubal sterilization.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-seven adverse events were reported in the study period. Pain was the most frequently reported event (217 events [47.5%]) followed by delivery catheter malfunction (121 events [26.4%]). Poststerilization pregnancy was reported in 61 events (13.3%), of which 29 were ectopic pregnancies. Other reported events included perforation (90 events [19.7%]), abnormal bleeding (44 events [9.6%]), and microinsert malposition (33 events [7.2%]). The evaluation and management of these events resulted in an additional surgical procedure in 270 cases (59.1%), of which 44 were hysterectomies.
CONCLUSION: Sixty-one unintended poststerilization pregnancies were reported in the study period, of which 29 (47.5%) were ectopic gestations. Thus, ectopic pregnancy must be considered if a woman becomes pregnant after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization. Additionally, 44 women underwent hysterectomy after an adverse event reported to be associated with the use of the device.
Copyright © 2013 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Essure; Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience; Microinsert; Sterilization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183273     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  3 in total

1.  Essure Surgical Removal and Subsequent Resolution of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Isamarie Lora Alcantara; Shadi Rezai; Catherine Kirby; Annika Chadee; Cassandra E Henderson; Malvina Elmadjian
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-01-24

2.  Risk of Essure microinsert abdominal migration: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ricci; Stefano Restaino; Giovanni Di Lorenzo; Francesco Fanfani; Federica Scrimin; Francesco P Mangino
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Delayed systemic allergic dermatitis following Essure insert: A case report.

Authors:  Tanja Baltus; James Brown; Imad Mahmoud
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.