N Rudarakanchana1, C D Bicknell2, N J Cheshire2, N Burfitt3, A Chapman3, M Hamady4, J T Powell5. 1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK; Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: N.Rudarakanchana@imperial.ac.uk. 2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK; Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. 3. Department of Interventional Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. 4. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK; Department of Interventional Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. 5. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of variation in descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (dTAA) diameters measured on CT scans in different planes and by different observers and the potential impact on treatment decisions. METHODS: CT angiography of dTAA (N = 20) were assessed by three specialists, with measurements repeated after 1 month. Calliper measurements of maximum external diameters were made on unformatted images and perpendicular to the aneurysm centerline after image processing (corrected). Repeatability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Maximum corrected diameter measurements were smaller than axial measurements (66.3 ± 7.9 mm vs. 74.9 ± 20.9 mm, p < .001). Both intraobserver and interobserver variation were less for corrected than for axial measurements (mean intraobserver differences 5.0 ± 3.8 mm vs. 11.8 ± 9.3 mm, p < .001; mean interobserver differences 2.8 ± 2.5 mm versus 10.4 ± 14.0 mm, p < .001) and interobserver variation increased with aneurysm diameter for maximum axial but not corrected measurements. Using corrected rather than axial measurements could have changed treatment decisions in two patients (10%) using a treatment threshold diameter of 55 mm and 10 patients (50%) using a threshold of 65 mm. CONCLUSION: Corrected diameters were smaller than axial diameters, could be measured with higher repeatability, and were subject to less interobserver variability. Using corrected versus axial measurements would have changed management decisions in up to half of the cases in this study.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of variation in descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (dTAA) diameters measured on CT scans in different planes and by different observers and the potential impact on treatment decisions. METHODS: CT angiography of dTAA (N = 20) were assessed by three specialists, with measurements repeated after 1 month. Calliper measurements of maximum external diameters were made on unformatted images and perpendicular to the aneurysm centerline after image processing (corrected). Repeatability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Maximum corrected diameter measurements were smaller than axial measurements (66.3 ± 7.9 mm vs. 74.9 ± 20.9 mm, p < .001). Both intraobserver and interobserver variation were less for corrected than for axial measurements (mean intraobserver differences 5.0 ± 3.8 mm vs. 11.8 ± 9.3 mm, p < .001; mean interobserver differences 2.8 ± 2.5 mm versus 10.4 ± 14.0 mm, p < .001) and interobserver variation increased with aneurysm diameter for maximum axial but not corrected measurements. Using corrected rather than axial measurements could have changed treatment decisions in two patients (10%) using a treatment threshold diameter of 55 mm and 10 patients (50%) using a threshold of 65 mm. CONCLUSION: Corrected diameters were smaller than axial diameters, could be measured with higher repeatability, and were subject to less interobserver variability. Using corrected versus axial measurements would have changed management decisions in up to half of the cases in this study.
Authors: Fabiola Bezerra de Carvalho Macruz; Charles Lu; Julia Strout; Angelo Takigami; Rupert Brooks; Sean Doyle; Min Yun; Varun Buch; Sandeep Hedgire; Brian Ghoshhajra Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2022-02-23
Authors: Nicholas S Burris; Zhangxing Bian; Jeffrey Dominic; Jianyang Zhong; Ignas B Houben; Theodorus M J van Bakel; Himanshu J Patel; Brian D Ross; Gary E Christensen; Charles R Hatt Journal: Radiology Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Bouke P Adriaans; Joachim E Wildberger; Jos J M Westenberg; Hildo J Lamb; Simon Schalla Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 5.315