Literature DB >> 24182694

Turbulence intensity measurements using particle image velocimetry in diseased carotid artery models: effect of stenosis severity, plaque eccentricity, and ulceration.

Sarah Kefayati1, David W Holdsworth2, Tamie L Poepping3.   

Abstract

Clinical decision-making for the treatment of patients with diseased carotid artery is mainly based on the severity of the stenosis. However, stenosis severity alone is not a sensitive indicator, and other local factors for the assessment of stroke risk are required. Flow disturbance is of particular interest due to its proven association with increased thromboembolic activities. The objective of this study was to investigate the level of turbulence intensity (TI) with regards to certain geometrical features of the plaque - namely stenosis severity, eccentricity, and ulceration. A family of eight carotid-artery bifurcation models was examined using particle image velocimetry. Results showed a marked difference in turbulence intensity among these models; increasing degree of stenosis severity resulted in increased turbulence intensity, going from 0.12 m/s for mild stenosis to 0.37 m/s for severe stenosis (with concentric geometry). Moreover, independent of stenosis severity, eccentricity led to further elevations in turbulence intensity, increasing TI by 0.05-0.10 m/s over the counterpart concentric plaque. The presence of ulceration (in a 50% eccentric plaque) produced a larger portion of moderate turbulence intensity (~0.10 m/s) compared to the non-ulcerated model, more proximal to the bifurcation apex in the post-stenotic recirculation zone. The effect of plaque eccentricity and ulceration in enhancing the downstream turbulence has potential clinical implications for a more sensitive assessment of stroke risk beyond stenosis severity alone.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; Plaque eccentricity; Stenosis severity; Stereoscopic PIV; Stroke; Thrombosis; Turbulence intensity; Ulceration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24182694     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Synergy between shear-induced migration and secondary flows on red blood cells transport in arteries: considerations on oxygen transport.

Authors:  Jacopo Biasetti; Pier Giorgio Spazzini; Ulf Hedin; T Christian Gasser
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The manifestation of vortical and secondary flow in the cerebral venous outflow tract: An in vivo MR velocimetry study.

Authors:  Sarah Kefayati; Matthew Amans; Farshid Faraji; Megan Ballweber; Evan Kao; Sinyeob Ahn; Karl Meisel; Van Halbach; David Saloner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Transport physics and biorheology in the setting of hemostasis and thrombosis.

Authors:  L F Brass; S L Diamond
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Characteristics of pulsatile flows in curved stenosed channels.

Authors:  Hyeonji Hong; Eunseop Yeom; Ho Seong Ji; Hyun Dong Kim; Kyung Chun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Detecting carotid stenosis from skin vibrations using Laser Doppler Vibrometry - An in vitro proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Viviana Mancini; Daniela Tommasin; Yanlu Li; Jonathan Reeves; Roel Baets; Steve Greenwald; Patrick Segers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  High frame rate doppler ultrasound bandwidth imaging for flow instability mapping.

Authors:  Billy Y S Yiu; Adrian J Y Chee; Guo Tang; Wenbo Luo; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  In vitro shear stress measurements using particle image velocimetry in a family of carotid artery models: effect of stenosis severity, plaque eccentricity, and ulceration.

Authors:  Sarah Kefayati; Jaques S Milner; David W Holdsworth; Tamie L Poepping
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Physiologic blood flow is turbulent.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Simon Tupin; Sherif Rashad; Toshiki Endo; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.