Literature DB >> 24182413

Impact of final oocyte maturation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering and different luteal support protocols on endometrial gene expression.

Alfonso Bermejo1, María Cerrillo1, María Ruiz-Alonso2, David Blesa3, Carlos Simón3, Antonio Pellicer4, Juan A Garcia-Velasco5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use microarray technology to analyze endometrial gene expression after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) triggering with four different protocols of luteal support in comparison with results obtained after a human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated private assisted-reproduction center. PATIENT(S): 25 healthy oocyte donors undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. INTERVENTION(S): On day of final oocyte maturation, randomization to [1] GnRH-agonist triggering and luteal support with oral estradiol (2 mg/8 hours) and vaginal progesterone (200 mg/12 hours), [2] GnRH-a and a daily dose of 150 IU of recombinant LH from oocyte pickup, [3] GnRH-a and a single bolus of 60 μg of recombinant hCG on oocyte pickup, [4] GnRH-a and three doses of 20 μg of recombinant hCG separated by 48 hours, or [5] 250 μg of recombinant hCG for trigger and standard luteal support; with endometrial biopsy samples collected 7 days after triggering. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gene expression using the Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) and pathway and network analysis of study groups 1-4 compared with controls (group 5). RESULT(S): The 56 genes in group 1 (25 up-regulated and 31 down-regulated) exhibited altered expression compared with the 36 genes from group 2 (13 up-regulated and 23 down-regulated), 44 from group 3 (28 up-regulated and 16 down-regulated), and 30 (20 up-regulated and 10 down-regulated) from group 4. CONCLUSION(S): Differences were seen in endometrial gene expression related to the type of ovulation trigger and luteal support. However, gene expression after the GnRH-a trigger and modified luteal support adding LH/hCG activity more closely resembles the pattern seen in the hCG group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2011-003250-34.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial receptivity; GnRH agonist; gene expression; ovarian stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24182413     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

Review 1.  Human Endometrial Transcriptomics: Implications for Embryonic Implantation.

Authors:  Eva Gómez; Maria Ruíz-Alonso; Jose Miravet; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  The Clinical Efficacy of Personalized Embryo Transfer Guided by the Endometrial Receptivity Array/Analysis on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhenteng Liu; Xuemei Liu; Meimei Wang; Huishan Zhao; Shunzhi He; Shoucui Lai; Qinglan Qu; Xinrong Wang; Dongmei Zhao; Hongchu Bao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ohara; Hidehiko Matsubayashi; Yosuke Suzuki; Yukiko Takaya; Kohei Yamaguchi; Masakazu Doshida; Takumi Takeuchi; Tomomoto Ishikawa; Mika Handa; Tatsuya Miyake; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 4.  Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue?

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.234

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.