Literature DB >> 24182239

Proof of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation.

Paul Busch1, Pekka Lahti, Reinhard F Werner.   

Abstract

While the slogan "no measurement without disturbance" has established itself under the name of the Heisenberg effect in the consciousness of the scientifically interested public, a precise statement of this fundamental feature of the quantum world has remained elusive, and serious attempts at rigorous formulations of it as a consequence of quantum theory have led to seemingly conflicting preliminary results. Here we show that despite recent claims to the contrary [L. Rozema et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 100404 (2012)], Heisenberg-type inequalities can be proven that describe a tradeoff between the precision of a position measurement and the necessary resulting disturbance of momentum (and vice versa). More generally, these inequalities are instances of an uncertainty relation for the imprecisions of any joint measurement of position and momentum. Measures of error and disturbance are here defined as figures of merit characteristic of measuring devices. As such they are state independent, each giving worst-case estimates across all states, in contrast to previous work that is concerned with the relationship between error and disturbance in an individual state.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24182239     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.160405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  18 in total

1.  Entropic Uncertainty Relation and Information Exclusion Relation for multiple measurements in the presence of quantum memory.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Yang Zhang; Chang-shui Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Sum uncertainty relations for arbitrary N incompatible observables.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Shao-Ming Fei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Information complementarity: A new paradigm for decoding quantum incompatibility.

Authors:  Huangjun Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Weighted Uncertainty Relations.

Authors:  Yunlong Xiao; Naihuan Jing; Xianqing Li-Jost; Shao-Ming Fei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Quantum uncertainty switches on or off the error-disturbance tradeoff.

Authors:  Yu-Xiang Zhang; Zu-En Su; Xuanmin Zhu; Shengjun Wu; Zeng-Bing Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Multi-observable Uncertainty Relations in Product Form of Variances.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Qin; Shao-Ming Fei; Xianqing Li-Jost
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Disturbance-Disturbance uncertainty relation: The statistical distinguishability of quantum states determines disturbance.

Authors:  E Benítez Rodríguez; L M Arévalo Aguilar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Unified and Exact Framework for Variance-Based Uncertainty Relations.

Authors:  Xiao Zheng; Shao-Qiang Ma; Guo-Feng Zhang; Heng Fan; Wu-Ming Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reformulating the Quantum Uncertainty Relation.

Authors:  Jun-Li Li; Cong-Feng Qiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Verifying Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation using a single trapped ion.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Leilei Yan; Shijie Gong; Zhihao Ma; Jiuzhou He; Taiping Xiong; Liang Chen; Wanli Yang; Mang Feng; Vlatko Vedral
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.