Literature DB >> 24182227

Nature and outcomes of the increased incidence of colorectal malignancy after liver transplantation in Australasia.

Deborah J Verran1, Marie H Mulhearn, Pamela J Dilworth, Glenda A Balderson, Stephen Munn, John W Chen, Michael A Fink, Michael D Crawford, Geoffrey W McCaughan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether incidence of colorectal malignancy is increased in Australasian liver transplant recipients compared with the general population of Australia, and to assess the characteristics and outcomes of colorectal malignancy in this patient group. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Data on patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) and had a diagnosis of de-novo colorectal malignancy after transplantation during the period 1985-2011 were obtained from the Australia and New Zealand Liver Transplant Registry, and these data were compared with colorectal malignancy data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from OLTx to diagnosis of colorectal malignancy, stage of colorectal malignancy at diagnosis, patient survival, and standardised incidence ratio (SIR) for colorectal malignancy.
RESULTS: Forty-eight of 3735 recipients (1.3%) were diagnosed with colorectal malignancy at a median of 7.3 years after OLTx. More advanced colorectal malignancy (regional or metastatic disease) was evident at diagnosis in 20 of the 48 patients; these patients tended to be younger than patients with less advanced malignancy (P = 0.01) and diagnosed sooner after OLTx (P = 0.005). Despite treatment predominantly with surgery, 19 of the 48 patients died from the malignancy. The overall SIR for colorectal malignancy liver transplant recipients compared with the general population of Australia was 2.80 (95% CI, 2.06-3.71).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of colorectal malignancy is increased in liver transplant recipients in comparison with the general population. Of concern is the tendency for advanced malignancy to be diagnosed in younger patients. These data highlight the importance of considering whether specific guidelines for colorectal malignancy screening in the Australasian adult liver transplant population are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24182227     DOI: 10.5694/mja13.10102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

Review 1.  Neoplastic disease after liver transplantation: Focus on de novo neoplasms.

Authors:  Patrizia Burra; Kryssia I Rodriguez-Castro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Current Challenges in the Post-Transplant Care of Liver Transplant Recipients in Germany.

Authors:  Kerstin Herzer; Martina Sterneck; Martin-Walter Welker; Silvio Nadalin; Gabriele Kirchner; Felix Braun; Christina Malessa; Adam Herber; Johann Pratschke; Karl Heinz Weiss; Elmar Jaeckel; Frank Tacke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Cancer Risks in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Results from a Comprehensive Analysis of 72 Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Zhenyu Huo; Caichen Li; Xin Xu; Fan Ge; Runchen Wang; Yaokai Wen; Haoxin Peng; Xiangrong Wu; Hengrui Liang; Guilin Peng; Run Li; Danxia Huang; Ying Chen; Ran Zhong; Bo Cheng; Shan Xiong; Weiyi Lin; Jianxing He; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 8.110

4.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma in liver transplant recipients: a case series.

Authors:  Muhammad A Rauf; Ioannis A Ziogas; Julia M Sealock; Lea K Davis; Manhal Izzy; Sophoclis P Alexopoulos; Lea K Matsuoka
Journal:  Ann Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2021-10-30

Review 5.  Alcohol use disorder and liver transplant: new perspectives and critical issues.

Authors:  Stefano Gitto; Silvia Aspite; Lucia Golfieri; Fabio Caputo; Francesco Vizzutti; Silvana Grandi; Valentino Patussi; Fabio Marra
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.884

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.