Literature DB >> 24181980

Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.

Han-Gyol Yi1, Jasmine E B Phelps, Rajka Smiljanic, Bharath Chandrasekaran.   

Abstract

The role of visual cues in native listeners' perception of speech produced by nonnative speakers has not been extensively studied. Native perception of English sentences produced by native English and Korean speakers in audio-only and audiovisual conditions was examined. Korean speakers were rated as more accented in audiovisual than in the audio-only condition. Visual cues enhanced word intelligibility for native English speech but less so for Korean-accented speech. Reduced intelligibility of Korean-accented audiovisual speech was associated with implicit visual biases, suggesting that listener-related factors partially influence the efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24181980     DOI: 10.1121/1.4822320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Revisiting the relationship between implicit racial bias and audiovisual benefit for nonnative-accented speech.

Authors:  Drew J McLaughlin; Violet A Brown; Sita Carraturo; Kristin J Van Engen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Audiovisual Speech Recognition With a Cochlear Implant and Increased Perceptual and Cognitive Demands.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  The neural processing of foreign-accented speech and its relationship to listener bias.

Authors:  Han-Gyol Yi; Rajka Smiljanic; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Nonnative audiovisual speech perception in noise: dissociable effects of the speaker and listener.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Han-Gyol Yi; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does race impact speech perception? An account of accented speech in two different multilingual locales.

Authors:  Ethan Kutlu; Mehrgol Tiv; Stefanie Wulff; Debra Titone
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-01-28

6.  Do faces speak volumes? Social expectations in speech comprehension and evaluation across three age groups.

Authors:  Adriana Hanulíková
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Wearing Face Masks While Using Different Speaking Styles in Noise on Speech Intelligibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yi; Ashly Pingsterhaus; Woonyoung Song
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-28

8.  Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.

Authors:  Emily Waddington; Brittany N Jaekel; Anna R Tinnemore; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Audiovisual cues benefit recognition of accented speech in noise but not perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Briony Banks; Emma Gowen; Kevin J Munro; Patti Adank
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effect of Simultaneous Bilingualism on Speech Intelligibility across Different Masker Types, Modalities, and Signal-to-Noise Ratios in School-Age Children.

Authors:  Rachel Reetzke; Boji Pak-Wing Lam; Zilong Xie; Li Sheng; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.