Literature DB >> 24180566

Surgical management of traumatic brain injury: a comparative-effectiveness study of 2 centers.

Jed A Hartings1, Steven Vidgeon, Anthony J Strong, Chris Zacko, Achala Vagal, Norberto Andaluz, Thomas Ridder, Richard Stanger, Martin Fabricius, Bruce Mathern, Clemens Pahl, Christos M Tolias, M Ross Bullock.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Mass lesions from traumatic brain injury (TBI) often require surgical evacuation as a life-saving measure and to improve outcomes, but optimal timing and surgical technique, including decompressive craniectomy, have not been fully defined. The authors compared neurosurgical approaches in the treatment of TBI at 2 academic medical centers to document variations in real-world practice and evaluate the efficacies of different approaches on postsurgical course and long-term outcome.
METHODS: Patients 18 years of age or older who required neurosurgical lesion evacuation or decompression for TBI were enrolled in the Co-Operative Studies on Brain Injury Depolarizations (COSBID) at King's College Hospital (KCH, n = 27) and Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU, n = 24) from July 2004 to March 2010. Subdural electrode strips were placed at the time of surgery for subsequent electrocorticographic monitoring of spreading depolarizations; injury characteristics, physiological monitoring data, and 6-month outcomes were collected prospectively. CT scans and medical records were reviewed retrospectively to determine lesion characteristics, surgical indications, and procedures performed.
RESULTS: Patients enrolled at KCH were significantly older than those enrolled at VCU (48 vs 34 years, p < 0.01) and falls were more commonly the cause of TBI in the KCH group than in the VCU group. Otherwise, KCH and VCU patients had similar prognoses, lesion types (subdural hematomas: 30%-35%; parenchymal contusions: 48%-52%), signs of mass effect (midline shift ≥ 5 mm: 43%-52%), and preoperative intracranial pressure (ICP). At VCU, however, surgeries were performed earlier (median 0.51 vs 0.83 days posttrauma, p < 0.05), bone flaps were larger (mean 82 vs 53 cm(2), p < 0.001), and craniectomies were more common (performed in 75% vs 44% of cases, p < 0.05). Postoperatively, maximum ICP values were lower at VCU (mean 22.5 vs 31.4 mm Hg, p < 0.01). Differences in incidence of spreading depolarizations (KCH: 63%, VCU: 42%, p = 0.13) and poor outcomes (KCH: 54%, VCU: 33%, p = 0.14) were not significant. In a subgroup analysis of only those patients who underwent early (< 24 hours) lesion evacuation (KCH: n = 14; VCU: n = 16), however, VCU patients fared significantly better. In the VCU patients, bone flaps were larger (mean 85 vs 48 cm(2) at KCH, p < 0.001), spreading depolarizations were less common (31% vs 86% at KCH, p < 0.01), postoperative ICP values were lower (mean: 20.8 vs 30.2 mm Hg at KCH, p < 0.05), and good outcomes were more common (69% vs 29% at KCH, p < 0.05). Spreading depolarizations were the only significant predictor of outcome in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This comparative-effectiveness study provides evidence for major practice variation in surgical management of severe TBI. Although ages differed between the 2 cohorts, the results suggest that a more aggressive approach, including earlier surgery, larger craniotomy, and removal of bone flap, may reduce ICP, prevent cortical spreading depolarizations, and improve outcomes. In particular, patients requiring evacuation of subdural hematomas and contusions may benefit from decompressive craniectomy in conjunction with lesion evacuation, even when elevated ICP is not a factor in the decision to perform surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24180566     DOI: 10.3171/2013.9.JNS13581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  19 in total

Review 1.  Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David B Kurland; Ariana Khaladj-Ghom; Jesse A Stokum; Brianna Carusillo; Jason K Karimy; Volodymyr Gerzanich; Juan Sahuquillo; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  The continuum of spreading depolarizations in acute cortical lesion development: Examining Leão's legacy.

Authors:  Jed A Hartings; C William Shuttleworth; Sergei A Kirov; Cenk Ayata; Jason M Hinzman; Brandon Foreman; R David Andrew; Martyn G Boutelle; K C Brennan; Andrew P Carlson; Markus A Dahlem; Christoph Drenckhahn; Christian Dohmen; Martin Fabricius; Eszter Farkas; Delphine Feuerstein; Rudolf Graf; Raimund Helbok; Martin Lauritzen; Sebastian Major; Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Frank Richter; Eric S Rosenthal; Oliver W Sakowitz; Renán Sánchez-Porras; Edgar Santos; Michael Schöll; Anthony J Strong; Anja Urbach; M Brandon Westover; Maren Kl Winkler; Otto W Witte; Johannes Woitzik; Jens P Dreier
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  Spreading Depression, Spreading Depolarizations, and the Cerebral Vasculature.

Authors:  Cenk Ayata; Martin Lauritzen
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  An Algorithm for Automated, Noninvasive Detection of Cortical Spreading Depolarizations Based on EEG Simulations.

Authors:  Alireza Chamanzar; Shilpa George; Praveen Venkatesh; Maysamreza Chamanzar; Lori Shutter; Jonathan Elmer; Pulkit Grover
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Mapping spreading depolarisations after traumatic brain injury: a pilot clinical study protocol.

Authors:  Samuel W Cramer; Isabela Peña Pino; Anant Naik; Danielle Carlson; Michael C Park; David P Darrow
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 6.  Traumatic brain injury-induced autoregulatory dysfunction and spreading depression-related neurovascular uncoupling: Pathomechanisms, perspectives, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Peter Toth; Nikolett Szarka; Eszter Farkas; Erzsebet Ezer; Endre Czeiter; Krisztina Amrein; Zoltan Ungvari; Jed A Hartings; Andras Buki; Akos Koller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Hypertonic saline administration and complex traumatic brain injury outcomes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Rema J Malik; Gregory S Huang; Chander M Kohli; Brian P Brocker; Kene T Ugokwe
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-06-20

8.  Excitotoxicity and Metabolic Crisis Are Associated with Spreading Depolarizations in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Jason M Hinzman; J Adam Wilson; Anna Teresa Mazzeo; M Ross Bullock; Jed A Hartings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Neurostereologic Lesion Volumes and Spreading Depolarizations in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Nina Eriksen; Bente Pakkenberg; Egill Rostrup; David O Okonkwo; Bruce Mathern; Lori A Shutter; Anthony J Strong; Johannes Woitzik; Clemens Pahl; Jens P Dreier; Peter Martus; Martin J Lauritzen; Martin Fabricius; Jed A Hartings
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: developing the evidence base.

Authors:  Angelos G Kolias; Hadie Adams; Ivan Timofeev; Marek Czosnyka; Elizabeth A Corteen; John D Pickard; Carole Turner; Barbara A Gregson; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Gordon D Murray; David K Menon; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 1.596

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.