Literature DB >> 24180432

Mode of action framework analysis for receptor-mediated toxicity: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) as a case study.

J Christopher Corton1, Michael L Cunningham, B Timothy Hummer, Christopher Lau, Bette Meek, Jeffrey M Peters, James A Popp, Lorenz Rhomberg, Jennifer Seed, James E Klaunig.   

Abstract

Several therapeutic agents and industrial chemicals induce liver tumors in rodents through the activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). The cellular and molecular events by which PPARα activators induce rodent hepatocarcinogenesis has been extensively studied and elucidated. This review summarizes the weight of evidence relevant to the hypothesized mode of action (MOA) for PPARα activator-induced rodent hepatocarcinogenesis and identifies gaps in our knowledge of this MOA. Chemical-specific and mechanistic data support concordance of temporal and dose-response relationships for the key events associated with many PPARα activators including a phthalate ester plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and the drug gemfibrozil. While biologically plausible in humans, the hypothesized key events in the rodent MOA, for PPARα activators, are unlikely to induce liver tumors in humans because of toxicodynamic and biological differences in responses. This conclusion is based on minimal or no effects observed on growth pathways, hepatocellular proliferation and liver tumors in humans and/or species (including hamsters, guinea pigs and cynomolgous monkeys) that are more appropriate human surrogates than mice and rats at overlapping dose levels. Overall, the panel concluded that significant quantitative differences in PPARα activator-induced effects related to liver cancer formation exist between rodents and humans. On the basis of these quantitative differences, most of the workgroup felt that the rodent MOA is "not relevant to humans" with the remaining members concluding that the MOA is "unlikely to be relevant to humans". The two groups differed in their level of confidence based on perceived limitations of the quantitative and mechanistic knowledge of the species differences, which for some panel members strongly supports but cannot preclude the absence of effects under unlikely exposure scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24180432     DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2013.835784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  50 in total

1.  A Set of Six Gene Expression Biomarkers Identify Rat Liver Tumorigens in Short-term Assays.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Thomas Hill; Jeffrey J Sutherland; James L Stevens; John Rooney
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Perfluoroalkyl acids-induced liver steatosis: Effects on genes controlling lipid homeostasis.

Authors:  Kaberi P Das; Carmen R Wood; Mimi T Lin; Anatoly A Starkov; Christopher Lau; Kendall B Wallace; J Christopher Corton; Barbara D Abbott
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Use of high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening data in cancer hazard evaluations by IARC Monograph Working Groups.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Kathryn Z Guyton; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Dose-response analysis of epigenetic, metabolic, and apical endpoints after short-term exposure to experimental hepatotoxicants.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Lynea A Murphy; Haixia Lin; Melissa R Schisler; Jinchun Sun; Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Radhakrishna Sura; Kamin Johnson; Matthew J LeBaron; Ilias G Kavouras; Laura K Schnackenberg; Richard D Beger; Reza J Rasoulpour; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 5.  Case examples of an evaluation of the human relevance of the pyrethroids/pyrethrins-induced liver tumours in rodents based on the mode of action.

Authors:  Tomoya Yamada
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 6.  Role of xenobiotics in the induction and progression of fatty liver disease.

Authors:  James E Klaunig; Xilin Li; Zemin Wang
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 7.  Human relevance of rodent liver tumour formation by constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators.

Authors:  Brian G Lake
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.524

8.  Application of a combined aggregate exposure pathway and adverse outcome pathway (AEP-AOP) approach to inform a cumulative risk assessment: A case study with phthalates.

Authors:  Rebecca A Clewell; Jeremy A Leonard; Chantel I Nicolas; Jerry L Campbell; Miyoung Yoon; Alina Y Efremenko; Patrick D McMullen; Melvin E Andersen; Harvey J Clewell; Katherine A Phillips; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Perfluorooctanoic acid activates multiple nuclear receptor pathways and skews expression of genes regulating cholesterol homeostasis in liver of humanized PPARα mice fed an American diet.

Authors:  J J Schlezinger; H Puckett; J Oliver; G Nielsen; W Heiger-Bernays; T F Webster
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Prenatal exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) affects reproductive outcomes in female mice.

Authors:  Sarah Niermann; Saniya Rattan; Emily Brehm; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.