Literature DB >> 24179988

Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses with various pontics.

Leila Perea, Jukka P Matinlinna, Mimmi Tolvanen, Lippo V Lassila, Pekka K Vallittu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the load-bearing capacities of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with pontics of various materials and thicknesses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inlay preparations for retaining FDPs were made in a polymer phantom model. Seventy-two FDPs with frameworks made of continuous unidirectional glass fibers (everStick C&B) were fabricated. Three different pontic materials were used: glass ceramics, polymer denture teeth, and composite resin. The FDPs were divided into 3 categories based on the occlusal thicknesses of the pontics (2.5 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm). The framework's vertical positioning varied respectively. Each pontic material category contained 3 groups (n = 8/group). In group 1, pontics were fabricated conventionally with composite resin (G-ӕnial, GC) with one additional transversal fiber reinforcement. In group 2, the pontics were polymer denture teeth (Heraeus- Kulzer). Group 3 had an IPS-Empress CAD pontic (Ivoclar Vivadent) milled using a Cerec CAD/CAM unit. Groups 1 and 2 served as controls. Each FDP was statically loaded from the pontic until initial fracture (IF) and final fracture (FF). Initial-fracture data were collected from the load-deflection graph.
RESULTS: ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences between the materials and occlusal thicknesses (p < 0.001). Quadratic analysis demonstrated the highest correlation between the thickness of the pontic and IF and FF values with ceramic pontics (IF: p < 0.001; R2 = 0.880; FF: p < 0.001; R2 = 0.953).
CONCLUSION: By increasing the occlusal thickness of the pontic, the load-bearing capacity of the FRC FDPs may be increased. The highest load-bearing capacity was obtained with 4.0 mm thickness in the ceramic pontic. However, with thinner pontics, polymer denture teeth and composite pontics resulted in higher load-bearing values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24179988     DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a30755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adhes Dent        ISSN: 1461-5185            Impact factor:   2.359


  6 in total

1.  Long-term behavior of double crown retained dentures with metal and metal-free secondary crowns and frameworks made of Vectris(©) on all-ceramic primary crowns: a prospective, randomized clinical trial up to 14 years.

Authors:  T Zahn; B Zahn; S Janko; P Weigl; S Gerhardt-Szép; H C Lauer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of fiber reinforcement placed at different locations of pontic in interim fixed partial denture to prevent fracture: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Surg Cdr Anita Kapri
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  An overview of development and status of fiber-reinforced composites as dental and medical biomaterials.

Authors:  Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 4.  Travel beyond Clinical Uses of Fiber Reinforced Composites (FRCs) in Dentistry: A Review of Past Employments, Present Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Pekka K Vallittu; Mutlu Özcan; Lippo V J Lassila; Paola Gandini; Maria Francesca Sfondrini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Spot-Bonding and Full-Bonding Techniques for Fiber Reinforced Composite (FRC) and Metallic Retainers.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Paola Gandini; Paola Tessera; Pekka K Vallittu; Lippo Lassila; Maria Francesca Sfondrini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Fiber-reinforced composite resin bridges: an alternative method to treat root-fractured teeth.

Authors:  Gun Heo; Eun-Hye Lee; Jin-Woo Kim; Kyung-Mo Cho; Se-Hee Park
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2019-12-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.