| Literature DB >> 24179383 |
Kalyaanamoorthy Subha1, Gopal Ramesh Kumar, Rajasekaran Rajalakshmi, Ganesan Aravindhan.
Abstract
Glioma, the common brain tumor, which arises from the glial cells, offers worse prognosis and therapy than any other tumors. Despite the genetic and pathological diversities of malignant gliomas, common signaling pathways that drive cellular proliferation, survival, invasion and angiogenesis have been identified. Very often, various tyrosine kinase receptors are inappropriately activated in human brain tumors and contribute to tumor malignancy. During such tumourous states where multiple pathways are involved, a few of them are responsbile for cell differentiation, proliferation and anti-apoptosis. Computational simulation studies of normal EGFR signaling in glioma together with the mutant EGFR mediated signaling and the MAPK signaling in glioma were carried out. There were no significant cross talks observed between the mutant EGFR and the MAPK pathways and thus from the simulation results, we propose a novel concept of 'multiple-targeting' that combines EGFR and Ras targeted therapy thereby providing a better therapeutic value against glioma. Diallyl Disulfide (DADS) that has been commonly used for Ras inhibition in glioma was taken for analyses and the effect of inhibiting the EGFR downstream signaling protein with this DADS was analyzed using the simulation and docking studies.Entities:
Keywords: EGFR; MAPK signaling; computational simulation; glioma; multiple targeting
Year: 2010 PMID: 24179383 PMCID: PMC3783289 DOI: 10.4137/BIC.S3720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Cancer ISSN: 1179-299X
List of Kinetic parameters.
| F | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.312 | |
| IGFR | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.481 | |
| PI3K | 6.02 | 1 | 0.0857 | |
| PTEN | 0.03 | 0.125 | 18.3 | |
| PIP3 | 10 | 1 | 0.0040 | |
| PKB | 0.05 | 1 | 0.005 | |
| RAF | 1 | 0.805 | 0.70601 | |
| EGF | 100 | 0.25 | 800000 | |
| TGF | 100 | 0.25 | 800000 | |
| EGFR | 1.11 | 3.3 | 2.6933 | |
| PLC | 0.2 | 0.031 | 25 | |
| grb2 | 0.1 | 0.0005 | 0.003 | |
| SOS | 0.5 | 0.0093 | 0.13 | |
| Ras GDP | 1 | 0.50505 | 0.02 | |
| Ras GTP | 0.1 | 0.50505 | 0.02 | |
| Raf inactive | 0 | 0.50505 | 0.02 | |
| Raf active | 0.5 | 2.5641 | 10 | |
| Mek active | 0.6 | 0.15909 | 0.3 | |
| Mek inactive | 0 | 0.0463 | 0.3 | |
| Erk active | 3.8 | 15.657 | 6 | |
| Erk inactive | 0 | 7.8 | 0.25 | |
| IP3 | 0.0142 | 0.006 | 9.9821 | |
| DAG | 0.16 | 0.15 | 17187.09 | |
| Ca | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.3428 | |
| PKC | 80 | 0.62 | 9.482 | |
| CAM | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.0092 | |
| CAMK | 0.83 | 0.25 | 7.623 | |
| MEK | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.8888 | |
| ERK | 7.5 | 0.085 | 667435.7 | |
| MTOR | 0.025 | 1 | 0.2439 | |
| RAS | 2 | 0.61 | 0.5363 |
ODEs of the model.
| Raf +ras gtp<->raf.ras gtp->raf* | D[Ras.GTP]/dt=- k11y(11)y(12)+k12y(13)+k13y(13) |
| D[Raf]=-k11y(11)y(12)+k12y(13) | |
| D[RasGTP.Raf]/dt=k11y(11)y(12)-k12y(14)-k13y(14) | |
| D[Raf*]/dt=-k13y(13) | |
| Raf*+mek<->raf*.mek->mek* | D[Raf*]=-k14y(14)y(15)+k15y(16)+k16y(16) |
| D[pp2A]/dt=-k14y(14)y(14)+k15y(16) | |
| D[Raf*.pp2A]/dt=k14y(14)y(15)-k15y(12)-k16y(12) | |
| D[Raf]/dt=k16y(16) | |
| Mek*+erk<->mek*.erk->erk* | D[Raf*]/dt=-k17y(14)y(17)+k18y(18)+k19y(18) |
| D[Mek]/dt=-k17y(14)y(17)+k18y(18) | |
| D[Raf*.Mek]/dt=k17y(14)y(17)-k18y(19)-k19y(19) | |
| D[Mek*]/dt=-k19y(18) | |
| Raf*+PP2A<->raf*.pp2A->raf | D[Mek*]/dt=-k20y(19)y(20)+k21y(21)+k22y(21) |
| D[pp2A]=-k20y(19)y(20)+k21y(21) | |
| D[Mek*.pp2A]/dt=k20y(19)y(20)-k21y(17)-k22y(17) | |
| D[Mek]/dt=k22y(21) | |
| Mek*+pp2A<->mek*.pp2A->mek | D[Mek*]/dt=-k23y(19)y(22)+k24y(23)+k25y(23) |
| D[Erk]/dt=-k23y(19)y(22)+k24y(23) | |
| D[Mek*.Erk]/dt=k23y(19)y(22)-k24y(24)-k25y(24) | |
| D[Erk*]/dt=-k25y(23) | |
| Erk*+mkp<->erk*.mkp->erk | D[Erk*]/dt=-k26y(24)y(25)+k27y(26)+k28y(26) |
| D[Mkp]/dt=-k26y(24)y(25)+k27y(26) | |
| D[Erk*.Mkp]/dt=k26y(24)y(25)-k27y(22)-k28y(22) | |
| D[Erk]/dt=k28y(26) |
Figure 1.Pictorial view of the constructed model of Normal EGFR mediated PI3K signaling.
Figure 2.Representation of the constructed model of mutant EGFR (varied parameters from that of normal EGFR) mediated PI3K signaling.
Figure 3.Expression of mutant EGFR (Shown in Yellow).
Figure 4.Inhibited Mutant EGFR kinetics (Shown in yellow).
Figure 5.Activation of Ras. GTP by the Normal EGFR signaling.
Figure 6.Inhibition of activated Ras. GTP. Raf.
Figure 7.Structure of Diallyl Disulfide (DADS).
Figure 8a.Docked structure of PI3K and DADS.
Figure 8b.Docked structure of ERK and DADS.
Figure 8c.Docked Structure of Mutant EGFRvIII and DADS.