STUDY OBJECTIVES: Electroencephalographic slow wave activity (SWA) during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep results from the synchronous oscillation of cortical neurons and is the standard measurement of sleep homeostasis. SWA is not a direct measure of sleep pressure accumulation, but rather a measure of the NREM-sleep response to accumulated sleep pressure. Currently, no practical standard for the direct measurement of sleep pressure accumulation exists. Recently, it was demonstrated that rat cortical neurons undergo oscillations during wake that are similar to the cortical oscillations responsible for SWA. Furthermore, these oscillations increase in number as time awake increases. Here we hypothesize that period-amplitude analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), which treats the EEG as a series of discrete waves, can measure these cortical oscillations, and thus, is a measure of sleep-pressure accumulation during extended wake. DESIGN: Mice were sleep deprived for 24 h by confinement to a slowly rotating wheel in order to assess wake-dependent changes in EEG wave incidence. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Continuous period-amplitude analysis of the waking EEG across 24 h of sleep deprivation revealed that the incidence of 2 to 6 Hz waves increased exponentially over the deprivation period. This increase in wave incidence appeared to occur in two phases with exponential time constants of approximately 0.12 h and 3 h. Further analysis revealed that the changes in wave incidence were significantly correlated with two established markers of sleep pressure, SWA and NREM sleep latency. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that wave incidence is an effective method of measuring sleep homeostasis in the waking EEG that provides better temporal resolution than spectral power analysis.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Electroencephalographic slow wave activity (SWA) during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep results from the synchronous oscillation of cortical neurons and is the standard measurement of sleep homeostasis. SWA is not a direct measure of sleep pressure accumulation, but rather a measure of the NREM-sleep response to accumulated sleep pressure. Currently, no practical standard for the direct measurement of sleep pressure accumulation exists. Recently, it was demonstrated that rat cortical neurons undergo oscillations during wake that are similar to the cortical oscillations responsible for SWA. Furthermore, these oscillations increase in number as time awake increases. Here we hypothesize that period-amplitude analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), which treats the EEG as a series of discrete waves, can measure these cortical oscillations, and thus, is a measure of sleep-pressure accumulation during extended wake. DESIGN:Mice were sleep deprived for 24 h by confinement to a slowly rotating wheel in order to assess wake-dependent changes in EEG wave incidence. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Continuous period-amplitude analysis of the waking EEG across 24 h of sleep deprivation revealed that the incidence of 2 to 6 Hz waves increased exponentially over the deprivation period. This increase in wave incidence appeared to occur in two phases with exponential time constants of approximately 0.12 h and 3 h. Further analysis revealed that the changes in wave incidence were significantly correlated with two established markers of sleep pressure, SWA and NREM sleep latency. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that wave incidence is an effective method of measuring sleep homeostasis in the waking EEG that provides better temporal resolution than spectral power analysis.
Authors: Hans-Peter Landolt; Julia V Rétey; Karin Tönz; Julie M Gottselig; Ramin Khatami; Isabelle Buckelmüller; Peter Achermann Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Mark R Zielinski; Dmitriy N Atochin; James M McNally; James T McKenna; Paul L Huang; Robert E Strecker; Dmitry Gerashchenko Journal: Sleep Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Daniella Buonfiglio; Daniel L Hummer; Ariel Armstrong; John Christopher Ehlen; Jason P DeBruyne Journal: J Pineal Res Date: 2020-10-11 Impact factor: 13.007
Authors: David T Plante; Michael R Goldstein; Jesse D Cook; Richard Smith; Brady A Riedner; Meredith E Rumble; Lauren Jelenchick; Andrea Roth; Giulio Tononi; Ruth M Benca; Michael J Peterson Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Jennifer A Evans; Ting-Chung Suen; Ben L Callif; Andrew S Mitchell; Oscar Castanon-Cervantes; Kimberly M Baker; Ian Kloehn; Kenkichi Baba; Brett J W Teubner; J Christopher Ehlen; Ketema N Paul; Timothy J Bartness; Gianluca Tosini; Tanya Leise; Alec J Davidson Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Joan F Alonso; Sergio Romero; Miguel A Mañanas; Marta Alcalá; Rosa M Antonijoan; Sandra Giménez Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: J Christopher Ehlen; Kelly A Jones; Lennisha Pinckney; Cloe L Gray; Susan Burette; Richard J Weinberg; Jennifer A Evans; Allison J Brager; Mark J Zylka; Ketema N Paul; Benjamin D Philpot; Jason P DeBruyne Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: J Christopher Ehlen; Allison J Brager; Julie Baggs; Lennisha Pinckney; Cloe L Gray; Jason P DeBruyne; Karyn A Esser; Joseph S Takahashi; Ketema N Paul Journal: Elife Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 8.140