Literature DB >> 24178750

Subcutaneous versus intravenous granulocyte colony stimulating factor for the treatment of neutropenia in hospitalized hemato-oncological patients: randomized controlled trial.

Mical Paul1, Ron Ram, Eitan Kugler, Laura Farbman, Anat Peck, Leonard Leibovici, Meir Lahav, Moshe Yeshurun, Ofer Shpilberg, Corina Herscovici, Ofir Wolach, Gilad Itchaki, Michal Bar-Natan, Liat Vidal, Anat Gafter-Gvili, Pia Raanani.   

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) might be safer and more convenient than subcutaneous (SC) administration to hospitalized hemato-oncological patients receiving chemotherapy. To compare IV vs. SC G-CSF administration, we conducted a randomized, open-label trial. We included inpatients receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma, and allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Patients were randomized to 5 mcg/kg single daily dose of IV bolus versus SC filgrastim given for its clinical indications. Patients were crossed-over to the alternate study arm on the subsequent chemotherapy course. The primary outcomes were time from initiation of filgrastim to recovery of stable neutrophil count of >500 cells/µL and a composite clinical outcome of infection or death assessed for the first course post-randomization. The study was stopped on the second interim analysis. Of 120 patients randomized, 118 were evaluated in the first treatment course. The mean time to neutropenia resolution was longer with IV G-CSF [7.9 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.6-9.1] compared with SC G-CSF (5.4 days, 95% CI 4.6-6.2), log-rank P = 0.001. Longer neutropenia duration was observed in all patient subgroups, except for patients undergoing autologous HCT. There was no significant difference between groups in the occurrence of infection or death, but more deaths were observed with IV (4/57, 7%) versus SC (1/61, 1.6%) G-CSF administration, P = 0.196. Similar results were observed when all 158 courses following cross-over were analyzed. Patients reported similar pain and satisfaction scores in both groups. Bolus IV administration of G-CSF results in longer neutropenia duration than SC administration, with no difference in clinical or quality-of-life measures.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24178750     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Drug Concentration, Rate of Infusion, and Flush Volume on G-CSF Drug Loss When Administered Intravenously.

Authors:  Pirun Saelue; Warunsuda Sripakdee; Krit Suknuntha
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-11-21

2.  Human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)/stem cell factor (SCF) fusion proteins: design, characterization and activity.

Authors:  Gitana Mickiene; Indrė Dalgėdienė; Gintautas Zvirblis; Zilvinas Dapkunas; Ieva Plikusiene; Ernesta Buzavaite-Verteliene; Zigmas Balevičius; Audronė Rukšėnaitė; Milda Pleckaityte
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  G-CSF and GM-CSF in Neutropenia.

Authors:  Hrishikesh M Mehta; Michael Malandra; Seth J Corey
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection.

Authors:  Jing-Fen Jin; Ling-Ling Zhu; Meng Chen; Hui-Min Xu; Hua-Fen Wang; Xiu-Qin Feng; Xiu-Ping Zhu; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Association between neutropenia and IgG antineutrophil antibodies in a case of CD40LG deficiency due to two novel mutations.

Authors:  Kristian Assing; Kaspar René Nielsen; Helene Broch Tenstad; Marianne Antonius Jakobsen; Christian Nielsen; Dorthe Grosen; Ulla Birgitte Hartling
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-25

6.  Continuous Intravenous Administration of Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating Factors-A Breakthrough in the Treatment of Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.

Authors:  Călin Căinap; Sânziana Cetean-Gheorghe; Laura Ancuta Pop; Daniel Corneliu Leucuta; Doina Piciu; Andra Mester; Cătălin Vlad; Crişan Ovidiu; Alexandra Gherman; Cristina Crişan; Alina Bereanu; Ovidiu Bălăcescu; Anne Marie Constantin; Irina Dicu; Loredana Bălăcescu; Adina Stan; Patriciu Achimaş-Cadariu; Simona Căinap
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of methimazole-induced agranulocytosis: a case report.

Authors:  Asha Birmingham; Carissa Mancuso; Craig Williams
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.