Literature DB >> 24178126

Forest biodiversity monitoring for REDD+: a case study of actors' views in Peru.

Steffen K Entenmann1, Thomas A M Kaphegyi, Christine B Schmitt.   

Abstract

The climate change mitigation mechanism Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in developing countries (REDD+) is currently being negotiated under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Integrating biodiversity monitoring into REDD+ facilitates compliance with the safeguards stipulated by the UNFCCC to exclude environmental risks. Interviews with actors engaged in REDD+ implementation and biodiversity conservation at the national and sub-national level in Peru (n = 30) and a literature review (n = 58) were conducted to pinpoint constraints and opportunities for monitoring effects of REDD+ management interventions on biodiversity, and to identify relevant biodiversity data and indicators. It was found that particularly sub-national actors, who were frequently involved in REDD+ pilot projects, acknowledge the availability of biodiversity data. Actors at both the national and sub-national levels, however, criticized data gaps and data being scattered across biodiversity research organizations. Most of the literature reviewed (78 %) included indicators on the state of certain biodiversity aspects, especially mammals. Indicators for pressure on biodiversity, impacts on environmental functions, or policy responses to environmental threats were addressed less frequently (31, 21, and 10 %, respectively). Integrating biodiversity concerns in carbon monitoring schemes was considered to have potential, although few specific examples were identified. The involvement of biodiversity research organizations in sub-national REDD+ activities enhances monitoring capacities. It is discussed how improvements in collaboration among actors from the project to the national level could facilitate the evaluation of existing information at the national level. Monitoring changes in ecosystem services may increase the ecological and socioeconomic viability of REDD+.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24178126     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0191-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  10 in total

1.  Land use. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?

Authors:  Jacob Phelps; Edward L Webb; Arun Agrawal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Maintenance of forest biodiversity in a post-Soviet governance model: perceptions by local actors in Lithuania.

Authors:  Marius Lazdinis; Per Angelstam; Imantas Lazdinis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation.

Authors:  Georg Kindermann; Michael Obersteiner; Brent Sohngen; Jayant Sathaye; Kenneth Andrasko; Ewald Rametsteiner; Bernhard Schlamadinger; Sven Wunder; Robert Beach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tree recruitment in an empty forest.

Authors:  John Terborgh; Gabriela Nuñez-Iturri; Nigel C A Pitman; Fernando H Cornejo Valverde; Patricia Alvarez; Varun Swamy; Elizabeth G Pringle; C E Timothy Paine
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services and livelihoods in tropical landscapes: towards a common agenda.

Authors:  Götz Schroth; Jeffrey A McNeely
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Enhancing conservation, ecosystem services, and local livelihoods through a wildlife premium mechanism.

Authors:  Eric Dinerstein; Keshav Varma; Eric Wikramanayake; George Powell; Susan Lumpkin; Robin Naidoo; Mike Korchinsky; Christian Del Valle; Shubash Lohani; John Seidensticker; Dirk Joldersma; Thomas Lovejoy; Andrey Kushlin
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  The effectiveness of contrasting protected areas in preventing deforestation in Madre de Dios, Peru.

Authors:  Anni Johanna Vuohelainen; Lauren Coad; Toby R Marthews; Yadvinder Malhi; Timothy J Killeen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options.

Authors:  Rebecca L Goldman; Heather Tallis; Peter Kareiva; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Understanding and integrating local perceptions of trees and forests into incentives for sustainable landscape management.

Authors:  Jean-Laurent Pfund; John Daniel Watts; Manuel Boissière; Amandine Boucard; Renee Marie Bullock; Andree Ekadinata; Sonya Dewi; Laurène Feintrenie; Patrice Levang; Salla Rantala; Douglas Sheil; Terry Sunderland; Terence Clarence Heethom Sunderland; Zora Lea Urech
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'.

Authors:  Hannes Böttcher; Katja Eisbrenner; Steffen Fritz; Georg Kindermann; Florian Kraxner; Ian McCallum; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2009-08-26
  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sandra Hawthorne; Manuel Boissière; Mary Elizabeth Felker; Stibniati Atmadja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.