Literature DB >> 24177758

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ductal compared to lobular carcinoma of the breast: a meta-analysis of published trials including 1,764 lobular breast cancer.

Fausto Petrelli1, Sandro Barni.   

Abstract

Infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast is associated with greater oestrogen receptor expression and poorer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, when compared to infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). In order to compare the pathological complete response rate (pCR) and breast conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with ILC versus IDC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify studies that investigated pCR, clinical response and BCS in patients with ILC that were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Random-effect models were adopted to estimate the summary odds ratio (OR), and the publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and Egger's regression asymmetry test. Seventeen studies were included (one randomized controlled trial, three prospective series and 13 retrospective trials), for a total of 12,645 IDCs and 1,764 ILCs to be compared. Ductal carcinoma of the breast was associated with a better pCR (from 5.9 to 16.7 %; OR = 3.1, 95 % CI 2.48-3.87, P < 0.00001) and rate of BCS (from 35.4 to 54.8 %; OR = 2.1, 95 % CI 1.8-2.45, P < 0.00001) compared to ILC. The overall pCR rates and BCS decreased in the ILCs compared with IDC when treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24177758     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2751-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  14 in total

Review 1.  Surgical issues in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  The impact of chemotherapy sequence on survival in node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nina Tamirisa; Hannah V Williamson; Samantha M Thomas; Kelly E Westbrook; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Terry Hyslop; Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Efficacy of Single-Agent Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis from Three Clinical Trials.

Authors:  José Pérez-Garcia; Javier Cortés; Otto Metzger Filho
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-12-21

Review 4.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Invasive lobular carcinoma: an understudied emergent subtype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason A Mouabbi; Amy Hassan; Bora Lim; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Debasish Tripathy; Rachel M Layman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Oriana A Petruolo; Melissa Pilewskie; Sujata Patil; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Hannah Y Wen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Differences in Response and Surgical Management with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  W Truin; G Vugts; R M H Roumen; A J G Maaskant-Braat; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; M van der Heiden-van der Loo; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; A C Voogd
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: long-term prognostic value of Ki67 and histological grade, alone and in combination with estrogen receptor.

Authors:  Ulrik Narbe; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Dorthe Grabau; Lisa Rydén; Christian Ingvar; Mårten Fernö
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-02-06

9.  Pathological non-response to chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer: an inter-institutional study.

Authors:  D Balmativola; C Marchiò; M Maule; L Chiusa; L Annaratone; F Maletta; F Montemurro; J Kulka; P Figueiredo; Z Varga; I Liepniece-Karele; G Cserni; E Arkoumani; I Amendoeira; G Callagy; A Reiner-Concin; A Cordoba; S Bianchi; T Decker; D Gläser; C Focke; P van Diest; D Grabau; E Lips; J Wesseling; R Arisio; E Medico; C Wells; A Sapino
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, prehabilitation, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).

Authors:  Denny Z H Levett; Michael P W Grocott
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.