Literature DB >> 24177235

Event-related potentials as brain correlates of item specific proportion congruent effects.

Judith M Shedden1, Bruce Milliken, Scott Watter, Sandra Monteiro.   

Abstract

The item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effect is consistent with the idea that control processes can be applied rapidly in accord with previously experienced conflict for a particular category. An alternative account of this effect is that it reflects item-specific learning processes unrelated to control at the level of the category. The accounts predict the same behaviour but differ in terms of electrophysiological predictions. Two experiments examined the ISPC effect with a particular focus on neural correlates that might reveal whether, and how early in processing, high and low proportion congruent items are treated as distinct classes of stimuli. For both tasks, the proportion congruency category was distinguished prior to the congruence of the specific stimulus, as early as 100 ms post-stimulus onset for the global/local identification task (Experiment 1) and 150 ms for the Stroop task (Experiment 2). The results support an on-line control account of ISPC effects.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attention; Automatic control; Context effects; Control processes; ERP; Event-related potentials; ISPC; Item-specific proportion congruent; P1

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24177235     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  5 in total

1.  Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.

Authors:  Giacomo Spinelli; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

2.  Temporal Dynamics of Memory-guided Cognitive Control and Generalization of Control via Overlapping Associative Memories.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Inês Bramão; Anna Khazenzon; Shao-Fang Wang; Mikael Johansson; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Boundary conditions for the influence of spatial proximity on context-specific attentional settings.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Implicit learning modulates attention capture: evidence from an item-specific proportion congruency manipulation.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Karen Willoughby; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-04

5.  Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Corentin Gonthier; Todd S Braver; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.