Literature DB >> 24177068

Response characteristics of primary auditory cortex neurons underlying perceptual asymmetry of ramped and damped sounds.

J Wang1, L Qin2, S Chimoto1, S Tazunoki1, Y Sato3.   

Abstract

Sound envelope plays a crucial role in perception: ramped sounds (slow attack and quick decay) are louder in strength and longer in subjective duration than damped sounds (quick attack and slow decay) even if they are equal in intensity and physical duration. To explain the asymmetrical perception, the perceptual constancy hypothesis supposes that the listener eliminates the slow decay of damped sounds from the judgment of perception, while the persistence of perception hypothesis supposes asymmetrical neural responses after the source has stopped. To understand neural mechanisms underlying the perceptual asymmetry, we explored response properties of the primary auditory cortex (A1) neurons during ramped and damped stimuli in awake cats. We found two distinct types of cells tuned to specific features of the sound envelope: edge cells sensitive to the temporal edge, such as quick attack and decay, while slope cells sensitive to slow attack and decay. The former needs a short (<2.5 ms) period of stimulus duration for evoking maximal peak responses, while the latter needs a long (20 ms) period, suggesting that the timescale of processing underlies differential sensitivity between the cell types. The findings suggest that perceptual constancy is not yet be executed at A1 because the specific cells distinguishing the direction of amplitude change (attack or decay) are lacking in A1. On the other hand, there is evidence of persistence of perception: overall response duration during ramped sound reached 1.4 times longer than that during damped sound, originating mainly from the response asymmetry of the edge cell (sensitive to the quick decay of ramped sounds but not to the slow decay of damped sounds), and neuronal persistence of excitation after the termination of ramped sounds was substantially longer than that of damped sounds, corresponding to the psychological evidence of persistence of perception.
Copyright © 2013 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A1; BF; PSTHs; RDI; SCI; SPL; auditory cortex; best frequency; integration time; perceptual asymmetry; peri-stimulus time histograms; primary auditory cortex; response asymmetry; response duration; response duration index; sound envelope; sound pressure level; spike count index

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24177068     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

1.  Diverse cortical codes for scene segmentation in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Temporal asymmetries in auditory coding and perception reflect multi-layered nonlinearities.

Authors:  Thomas Deneux; Alexandre Kempf; Aurélie Daret; Emmanuel Ponsot; Brice Bathellier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning.

Authors:  Junsei Horikawa; Hisayuki Ojima
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-04-21

4.  Cortical recruitment determines learning dynamics and strategy.

Authors:  Sebastian Ceballo; Jacques Bourg; Alexandre Kempf; Zuzanna Piwkowska; Aurélie Daret; Pierre Pinson; Thomas Deneux; Simon Rumpel; Brice Bathellier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Why do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? Evidence from "molecular psychophysics".

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn; Martha Kuta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perceptual Temporal Asymmetry Associated with Distinct ON and OFF Responses to Time-Varying Sounds with Rising versus Falling Intensity: A Magnetoencephalography Study.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Bing Cheng; Tess K Koerner; Robert S Schlauch; Keita Tanaka; Masaki Kawakatsu; Iku Nemoto; Toshiaki Imada
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-08-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.