Kazushi Numata1, Hiroyuki Fukuda2, Haruo Miwa2, Tomohiro Ishii2, Satoshi Moriya2, Masaaki Kondo2, Akito Nozaki2, Manabu Morimoto2, Masahiro Okada3, Shigeo Takebayashi4, Shin Maeda5, Akinori Nozawa6, Masayuki Nakano7, Katsuaki Tanaka2. 1. Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan. Electronic address: kz-numa@urahp.yokohama-cu.ac.jp. 2. Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan. 4. Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan. 5. Division of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan. 6. Department of Pathology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan. 7. Pathological Department, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24 Ofuna, Ofuna, Kanagawa 247-0055, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) imaging features of early hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and compared these findings with those obtained using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with 52 early HCCs with a mean maximal diameter of 15.6mm were enrolled in this retrospective study. After confirming the location of the target lesion using fusion imaging combining conventional US and hepatobiliary phase of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, we evaluated findings of contrast-enhanced US using a perflubutane-based contrast agent. The contrast-enhanced US detection rates for hyper-vascularity in early HCCs were compared with those obtained for contrast-enhanced CT. RESULTS: Transient hypo-vascularity subsequent to iso-vascularity during arterial phase and iso-vascularity during portal and post-vascular phases were the predominant contrast-enhanced US findings seen for 25 (48.1%) of the 52 early HCCs. Nine (17.3%) showed iso-vascularity during all three phases, while 1 (1.9%) showed hypo-vascularity during all three phases. The remaining 17 (32.7%) showed partial or whole hyper-vascularity during arterial phase, iso-vascularity during portal phase, and iso- or hypo-vascularity during post-vascular phase. The detection rate for the hyper-vascularity of early HCCs using contrast-enhanced US (32.7%, 17/52) was significantly higher than that obtained using contrast-enhanced CT (21.2%, 11/52) (P<0.05 by McNemar test). CONCLUSION: Hypo-vascularity, iso-vascularity, and hyper-vascularity were observed during the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced US in 50.0%, 17.3%, and 32.7% of the early HCCs, respectively. Contrast-enhanced US was more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of hyper-vascularity in early HCCs. Of note, early HCCs might not exhibit the early arterial enhancement that is generally considered to be a typical finding for HCCs.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) imaging features of early hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and compared these findings with those obtained using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with 52 early HCCs with a mean maximal diameter of 15.6mm were enrolled in this retrospective study. After confirming the location of the target lesion using fusion imaging combining conventional US and hepatobiliary phase of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, we evaluated findings of contrast-enhanced US using a perflubutane-based contrast agent. The contrast-enhanced US detection rates for hyper-vascularity in early HCCs were compared with those obtained for contrast-enhanced CT. RESULTS: Transient hypo-vascularity subsequent to iso-vascularity during arterial phase and iso-vascularity during portal and post-vascular phases were the predominant contrast-enhanced US findings seen for 25 (48.1%) of the 52 early HCCs. Nine (17.3%) showed iso-vascularity during all three phases, while 1 (1.9%) showed hypo-vascularity during all three phases. The remaining 17 (32.7%) showed partial or whole hyper-vascularity during arterial phase, iso-vascularity during portal phase, and iso- or hypo-vascularity during post-vascular phase. The detection rate for the hyper-vascularity of early HCCs using contrast-enhanced US (32.7%, 17/52) was significantly higher than that obtained using contrast-enhanced CT (21.2%, 11/52) (P<0.05 by McNemar test). CONCLUSION: Hypo-vascularity, iso-vascularity, and hyper-vascularity were observed during the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced US in 50.0%, 17.3%, and 32.7% of the early HCCs, respectively. Contrast-enhanced US was more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of hyper-vascularity in early HCCs. Of note, early HCCs might not exhibit the early arterial enhancement that is generally considered to be a typical finding for HCCs.