Literature DB >> 24176442

Warfarin use among older atrial fibrillation patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction managed with coronary stenting and dual antiplatelet therapy.

Emil L Fosbol1, Tracy Y Wang, Shuang Li, Jonathan Piccini, Renato D Lopes, Roger M Mills, Winslow Klaskala, Laine Thomas, Matthew T Roe, Eric D Peterson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the risk of readmission for bleeding and major cardiac events in stented non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
METHODS: For this patient population, selection of an antithrombotic strategy poses a unique challenge in clinical practice, and comparative outcome data are sparse. We linked NSTEMI patients aged ≥ 65 years in the CRUSADE Registry (2003-2006) to Medicare claims data. We examined patients with AF who received coronary stenting and either dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin + clopidogrel) or triple therapy (DAPT + warfarin) upon discharge. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to compare the 1-year risks of major cardiac events and readmission for bleeding.
RESULTS: We identified 1,648 stented NSTEMI AF patients. Of these, 1,200 (73%) received DAPT, and 448 (27%) received triple therapy at hospital discharge. Predicted thromboembolic and bleeding risks did not appear to influence the decision to receive DAPT or triple therapy. At 1 year, 20.4% had a major cardiac event, and 13.5% were admitted for bleeding. Use of triple therapy relative to DAPT at discharge was associated with a similar adjusted risk of major cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, CI 0.73-1.21) but a trend toward increased risk of readmission for bleeding (hazard ratio 1.29, CI 0.96-1.74, P = .09).
CONCLUSIONS: In routine practice and in contrast with practice recommendations, most elderly NSTEMI patients with AF who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement receive DAPT rather than triple therapy at discharge. Those receiving triple therapy versus DAPT had a similar risk of an ischemic event but a trend toward increased bleeding.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24176442     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  20 in total

1.  Combination of Oral Anticoagulants and Single Antiplatelets versus Triple Therapy in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome: Stroke Prevention among Asians.

Authors:  Anwar Santoso; Sunu B Raharjo
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-05-06

2.  Triple Antithrombotic Therapy and Outcomes in Post-PCI Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Javier A Valle; Laura Graham; Aerin DeRussy; Kamal Itani; Mary T Hawn; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Accuracy of Medical Claims for Identifying Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events After Myocardial Infarction : A Secondary Analysis of the TRANSLATE-ACS Study.

Authors:  Patricia O Guimarães; Arun Krishnamoorthy; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Kevin J Anstrom; Mark B Effron; Daniel B Mark; Patrick L McCollam; Linda Davidson-Ray; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 4.  Antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients requiring oral anticoagulant treatment. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Chen; Bin Chen; Jue Zhu; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Safety of Antithrombotic Agents in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Bianca Rocca; Steen Husted
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Percutaneous coronary intervention and atrial fibrillation: the triple therapy dilemma.

Authors:  Jung Rae Cho; Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Yueh-Hsin Wang; Hsien-Li Kao; Chi-Chuan Wang; Shin-Yi Lin; Fang-Ju Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 8.  Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renato D Lopes; Hwanhee Hong; Ralf E Harskamp; Deepak L Bhatt; Roxana Mehran; Christopher P Cannon; Christopher B Granger; Freek W A Verheugt; Jianghao Li; Jurriën M Ten Berg; Nikolaus Sarafoff; Pascal Vranckx; Andreas Goette; C Michael Gibson; John H Alexander
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

9.  Impact of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants on the Change of Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Soonil Kwon; Jin Hyung Jung; Eue Keun Choi; Seung Woo Lee; Jiesuck Park; So Ryoung Lee; Jeehoon Kang; Kyungdo Han; Kyung Woo Park; Seil Oh; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Impact of Triple Therapy in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Antonia Sambola; Maria Mutuberría; Bruno García Del Blanco; Albert Alonso; José A Barrabés; Héctor Bueno; Fernando Alfonso; Angel Cequier; Javier Zueco; Oriol Rodríguez-Leor; Pilar Tornos; David García-Dorado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.