| Literature DB >> 24175306 |
Runa Ghosh Auddy1, Md Farooque Abdullah, Suvadra Das, Partha Roy, Sriparna Datta, Arup Mukherjee.
Abstract
Wound healing is an innate physiological response that helps restore cellular and anatomic continuity of a tissue. Selective biodegradable and biocompatible polymer materials have provided useful scaffolds for wound healing and assisted cellular messaging. In the present study, guar gum, a polymeric galactomannan, was intrinsically modified to a new cationic biopolymer guar gum alkylamine (GGAA) for wound healing applications. Biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles (Agnp) were further impregnated in GGAA for extended evaluations in punch wound models in rodents. SEM studies showed silver nanoparticles well dispersed in the new guar matrix with a particle size of ~18 nm. In wound healing experiments, faster healing and improved cosmetic appearance were observed in the new nanobiomaterial treated group compared to commercially available silver alginate cream. The total protein, DNA, and hydroxyproline contents of the wound tissues were also significantly higher in the treated group as compared with the silver alginate cream (P < 0.05). Silver nanoparticles exerted positive effects because of their antimicrobial properties. The nanobiomaterial was observed to promote wound closure by inducing proliferation and migration of the keratinocytes at the wound site. The derivatized guar gum matrix additionally provided a hydrated surface necessary for cell proliferation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24175306 PMCID: PMC3794655 DOI: 10.1155/2013/912458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Arbitrary scoring system for the measurement of wound index.
| Gross changes | Wound index |
|---|---|
| Complete healing of wounds | 1 |
| Delayed but healthy healing | 2 |
| No initiation of healing, but the environment is healthy | 3 |
| Formation of pus: evidence of necrosis | 4 |
|
| |
| Total | 10 |
Physicochemical characterization of guar gum and its newer derivatives.
| Percentage composition CHN analysis in combustion technique | Degree of substitution | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound no. | Code | Compound name | Calculated % | Observed % | |||||
| C | H | N | C | H | N | ||||
| I | GG | Guar gum | 32.9 | 4.57 | — | 30.2 | 4.79 | — | — |
| II | GGAA | Guar gum alkylamine | 45.56 | 5.60 | 2.53 | 48.57 | 6.59 | 3.28 | 0.457 |
Figure 1UV-spectra of GGAA and NAg-GGAA. Colour codes: GGAA (purple) and NAg-GGAA (yellow).
Figure 2X-ray diffraction pattern of NAg-GGAA.
Figure 3(a) SEM study of NAg-GGAA and (b) EDX spectra of NAg-GGAA showing the presence of silver peaks.
Figure 4Area of wound closure in mm2 at 0th, 5th, 7th and 10th day. Results are mean ± SEM, n = 6 in each group, a P < 0.05 compared to control group, b P < 0.05 compared to GGAA treated group, c P < 0.05 compared to silver alginate group.
Changes in physical characteristics of wounds in different treatment groups.
| Treatment groups | Percentage wound contraction on the 10th day | Wound index | Healing period (days) | Tensile strength (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated control | 54.58 ± 3.45 | 2.69 ± 0.08 | 18.83 ± 0.48 | 257.2 ± 10.73 |
| GGAA treated | 69.64 ± 4.86a | 1.94 ± 0.06a | 15.50 ± 0.43a | 356.8 ± 9.88a |
| NAg-GGAA treated | 98.52 ± 7.54a,b,c | 1.35 ± 0.05a,b | 9.83 ± 0.31a,b,c | 522.5 ± 12.9a,b, c |
| Silver alginate | 89.15 ± 6.96a,b | 1.56 ± 0.05a,b | 12.5 ± 0.43a,b | 460.5 ± 11.66a,b |
Values were mean ± SEM, n = 6 in each group. a P < 0.05 compared to control group, b P < 0.05 compared to GGAA treated group, c P < 0.05 compared to silver alginate group.
Changes in biochemical parameters of wound tissues in different treatment groups.
| Treatment groups | DNA (mg/g tissue) | Total protein (mg/g tissue) | Hydroxyproline ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated control | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 15.13 ± 0.18 | 0.81 ± 0.02 |
| GGAA treated | 1.30 ± 0.03a | 16.98 ± 0.18a | 1.30 ± 0.03a |
| NAg-GGAA treated | 2.36 ± 0.04a,b,c | 23.91 ± 0.19a,b,c | 2.36 ± 0.04a,b,c |
| Silver alginate | 2.04 ± 0.09a,b | 21.27 ± 0.37a,b | 2.04 ± 0.09a,b |
Values were mean ± SEM, n = 8 in each group. a P < 0.05 compared to control group, b P < 0.05 compared to GGAA treated group, c P < 0.05 compared to silver alginate group.
Figure 5Hematoxylin and eosin stained granulation tissue at day 10. (a) Untreated control group, (b) GGAA treated group, (c) silver alginate cream with thin layer of epithelialization, and (d) NAg-GGAA treated group showing well organized granulation tissue and epithelialization (magnification 40x).