| Literature DB >> 24175306 |
Runa Ghosh Auddy1, Md Farooque Abdullah, Suvadra Das, Partha Roy, Sriparna Datta, Arup Mukherjee.
Abstract
Wound healing is an innate physiological response that helps restore cellular and anatomic continuity of a tissue. Selective biodegradable and biocompatible polymer materials have provided useful scaffolds for wound healing and assisted cellular messaging. In the present study,Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24175306 PMCID: PMC3794655 DOI: 10.1155/2013/912458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Arbitrary scoring system for the measurement of wound index.
| Gross changes | Wound index |
|---|---|
| Complete healing of wounds | 1 |
| Delayed but healthy healing | 2 |
| No initiation of healing, but the environment is healthy | 3 |
| Formation of pus: evidence of necrosis | 4 |
|
| |
| Total | 10 |
Physicochemical characterization of guar gum and its newer derivatives.
| Percentage composition CHN analysis in combustion technique | Degree of substitution | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound no. | Code | Compound name | Calculated % | Observed % | |||||
| C | H | N | C | H | N | ||||
| I | GG | Guar gum | 32.9 | 4.57 | — | 30.2 | 4.79 | — | — |
| II | GGAA | Guar gum alkylamine | 45.56 | 5.60 | 2.53 | 48.57 | 6.59 | 3.28 | 0.457 |
Figure 1UV-spectra of GGAA and NAg-GGAA. Colour codes: GGAA (purple) and NAg-GGAA (yellow).
Figure 2X-ray diffraction pattern of NAg-GGAA.
Figure 3(a) SEM study of NAg-GGAA and (b) EDX spectra of NAg-GGAA showing the presence of silver peaks.
Figure 4Area of wound closure in mm2 at 0th, 5th, 7th and 10th day. Results are mean ± SEM, n = 6 in each group, a P < 0.05 compared to control group, b P < 0.05 compared to GGAA treated group, c P < 0.05 compared to silver alginate group.
Changes in physical characteristics of wounds in different treatment groups.
| Treatment groups | Percentage wound contraction on the 10th day | Wound index | Healing period (days) | Tensile strength (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated control | 54.58 ± 3.45 | 2.69 ± 0.08 | 18.83 ± 0.48 | 257.2 ± 10.73 |
| GGAA treated | 69.64 ± 4.86a | 1.94 ± 0.06a | 15.50 ± 0.43a | 356.8 ± 9.88a |
| NAg-GGAA treated | 98.52 ± 7.54a,b,c | 1.35 ± 0.05a,b | 9.83 ± 0.31a,b,c | 522.5 ± 12.9a,b, c |
| Silver alginate | 89.15 ± 6.96a,b | 1.56 ± 0.05a,b | 12.5 ± 0.43a,b | 460.5 ± 11.66a,b |
Values were mean ± SEM, n = 6 in each group. a P < 0.05 compared to control group, b P < 0.05 compared to GGAA treated group, c P < 0.05 compared to silver alginate group.
Changes in biochemical parameters of wound tissues in different treatment groups.
| Treatment groups | DNA (mg/g tissue) | Total protein (mg/g tissue) | Hydroxyproline ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated control | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 15.13 ± 0.18 | 0.81 ± 0.02 |
| GGAA treated | 1.30 ± 0.03a | 16.98 ± 0.18a | 1.30 ± 0.03a |
| NAg-GGAA treated | 2.36 ± 0.04a,b,c | 23.91 ± 0.19a,b,c | 2.36 ± 0.04a,b,c |
| Silver alginate | 2.04 ± 0.09a,b | 21.27 ± 0.37a,b | 2.04 ± 0.09a,b |
Values were mean ± SEM, n = 8 in each group. a P < 0.05 compared to control group, b P < 0.05 compared to GGAA treated group, c P < 0.05 compared to silver alginate group.
Figure 5Hematoxylin and eosin stained granulation tissue at day 10. (a) Untreated control group, (b) GGAA treated group, (c) silver alginate cream with thin layer of epithelialization, and (d) NAg-GGAA treated group showing well organized granulation tissue and epithelialization (magnification 40x).