Literature DB >> 24174512

Pre-polysomnographic assessment using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire is not useful in identifying people at higher risk for obstructive sleep apnea.

Simone Scarlata1, Claudio Pedone, Giuseppe Curcio, Livio Cortese, Domenica Chiurco, Davide Fontana, Mariangela Calabrese, Riccardina Fusiello, Gloria Abbruzzese, Simona Santangelo, Anna Zito, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polysomnography remains the diagnostic gold standard for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), but it is time consuming and requires dedicated personnel and setting. It may be more useful to plan a polysomnogram based on a preliminary screening.
OBJECTIVE: To verify whether a questionnaire of general quality of sleep, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), could outperform a dedicated questionnaire (Epworth Sleep Scale: ESS) in targeting OSAS patients in an at risk population.
METHODS: 254 consecutive subjects attending the outpatient clinic for respiratory diseases were clinically evaluated for sleep apnea and referred to a 12 channel night-time polysomnography. All patients were administered the ESS and the PSQI before the procedure. The correlation between the Apnoea/Hypopnoea Index (AHI) and the global score of the PSQI was calculated; Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), Diagnostic accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. ESS performance was used as a control reference.
RESULTS: The mean age was 65.8 (standard deviation: 12.1) and the study group was 68.4% male. The mean BMI was 38.5; SD 7.7. Prevalence of OSAS in the study population was 55.5%; OSAS was severe in 60.5% of OSAS patients. ESS was significantly, but weakly, correlated with the AHI (AHI vs ESS: R = 0.308; p < 0.001), whereas PSQI was not (R = 0.037; p = 0.581). Both PSQI and ESS, however, performed unsatisfactorily: sensitivity 37.8% and 69.7%; Specificity 76.1% and 31.0%; Diagnostic Accuracy 57.5% and 49.8%; PPV 60% and 48.7%; NPV 56.3% and 52.2%; AUC 0.589 and 0.509, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The PSQI score is not helpful in the pre-polysomnographic assessment of people with suspected OSAS. Further studies are required to provide reliable pre-clinical instruments targeting patients amenable to polysomnography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obstructive Sleep Apnea; polysomnography; risk assessment; screening; sleep quality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24174512     DOI: 10.1177/0969141313511591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  12 in total

1.  Good and poor sleepers among OSA patients: sleep quality and overnight polysomnography findings.

Authors:  Linda Lusic Kalcina; Maja Valic; Renata Pecotic; Ivana Pavlinac Dodig; Zoran Dogas
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Short-term effects of a vibrotactile neck-based treatment device for positional obstructive sleep apnea: preliminary data on tolerability and efficacy.

Authors:  Simone Scarlata; Isaura Rossi Bartoli; Simona Santangelo; Gilda Giannunzio; Claudio Pedone; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Screening for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in asthma patients: a prospective study based on Berlin and STOP-Bang questionnaires.

Authors:  Huan Lu; Cuiping Fu; Wenjing Li; Hong Jiang; Xiaodan Wu; Shanqun Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Sex differences in subjectively reported symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea in community-dwelling adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jonna L Morris; Susan M Sereika; Eileen R Chasens
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Patterns and predictors of sleep quality before, during, and after hospitalization in older adults.

Authors:  Joseph M Dzierzewski; Michael Mitchell; Juan Carlos Rodriguez; Constance H Fung; Stella Jouldjian; Cathy A Alessi; Jennifer L Martin
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Sleep and neuropsychological performance in HIV+ subjects on efavirenz-based therapy and response to switch in therapy.

Authors:  Cecilia M Shikuma; Lindsay Kohorn; Robert Paul; Dominic C Chow; Kalpana J Kallianpur; Maegen Walker; Scott Souza; Louie Mar A Gangcuangco; Beau K Nakamoto; Francis D Pien; Timothy Duerler; Linda Castro; Lorna Nagamine; Bruce Soll
Journal:  HIV Clin Trials       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 7.  Measurements and status of sleep quality in patients with cancers.

Authors:  Dongying Chen; Zongyi Yin; Bo Fang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Screening Questionnaires for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Babak Amra; Behzad Rahmati; Forogh Soltaninejad; Awat Feizi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-05

9.  Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome by Electronic-Nose Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds.

Authors:  Simone Scarlata; Giorgio Pennazza; Marco Santonico; Simona Santangelo; Isaura Rossi Bartoli; Chiara Rivera; Chiara Vernile; Antonio De Vincentis; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  More severe hypoxemia is associated with better subjective sleep quality in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Meng-Ni Wu; Chiou-Lian Lai; Ching-Kuan Liu; Li-Min Liou; Chen-Wen Yen; Sharon Chia-Ju Chen; Cheng-Fang Hsieh; Sun-Wung Hsieh; Feng-Cheng Lin; Chung-Yao Hsu
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.