Literature DB >> 24174277

Improving the accuracy of protein stability predictions with multistate design using a variety of backbone ensembles.

James A Davey1, Roberto A Chica.   

Abstract

Multistate computational protein design (MSD) with backbone ensembles approximating conformational flexibility can predict higher quality sequences than single-state design with a single fixed backbone. However, it is currently unclear what characteristics of backbone ensembles are required for the accurate prediction of protein sequence stability. In this study, we aimed to improve the accuracy of protein stability predictions made with MSD by using a variety of backbone ensembles to recapitulate the experimentally measured stability of 85 Streptococcal protein G domain β1 sequences. Ensembles tested here include an NMR ensemble as well as those generated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, by Backrub motions, and by PertMin, a new method that we developed involving the perturbation of atomic coordinates followed by energy minimization. MSD with the PertMin ensembles resulted in the most accurate predictions by providing the highest number of stable sequences in the top 25, and by correctly binning sequences as stable or unstable with the highest success rate (≈90%) and the lowest number of false positives. The performance of PertMin ensembles is due to the fact that their members closely resemble the input crystal structure and have low potential energy. Conversely, the NMR ensemble as well as those generated by MD simulations at 500 or 1000 K reduced prediction accuracy due to their low structural similarity to the crystal structure. The ensembles tested herein thus represent on- or off-target models of the native protein fold and could be used in future studies to design for desired properties other than stability.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backrub; computational protein design; molecular dynamics; off-target ensemble; on-target ensemble; perturbation and energy minimization; protein G domain β1; receiver operating characteristic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24174277     DOI: 10.1002/prot.24457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  18 in total

1.  Flex ddG: Rosetta Ensemble-Based Estimation of Changes in Protein-Protein Binding Affinity upon Mutation.

Authors:  Kyle A Barlow; Shane Ó Conchúir; Samuel Thompson; Pooja Suresh; James E Lucas; Markus Heinonen; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Optimization of rotamers prior to template minimization improves stability predictions made by computational protein design.

Authors:  James A Davey; Roberto A Chica
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Computational tools help improve protein stability but with a solubility tradeoff.

Authors:  Aron Broom; Zachary Jacobi; Kyle Trainor; Elizabeth M Meiering
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Rational design of proteins that exchange on functional timescales.

Authors:  James A Davey; Adam M Damry; Natalie K Goto; Roberto A Chica
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  Comparison of Rosetta flexible-backbone computational protein design methods on binding interactions.

Authors:  Amanda L Loshbaugh; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-10

6.  Computational Design of Miniprotein Binders.

Authors:  Younes Bouchiba; Manon Ruffini; Thomas Schiex; Sophie Barbe
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Computationally Designed Bispecific Antibodies using Negative State Repertoires.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Karen J Froning; Shane Atwell; Hector Aldaz; Anna Pustilnik; Frances Lu; Flora Huang; Richard Yuan; Saleema Hassanali; Aaron K Chamberlain; Jonathan R Fitchett; Stephen J Demarest; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Computational design of a modular protein sense-response system.

Authors:  Anum A Glasgow; Yao-Ming Huang; Daniel J Mandell; Michael Thompson; Ryan Ritterson; Amanda L Loshbaugh; Jenna Pellegrino; Cody Krivacic; Roland A Pache; Kyle A Barlow; Noah Ollikainen; Deborah Jeon; Mark J S Kelly; James S Fraser; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Step-by-step design of proteins for small molecule interaction: A review on recent milestones.

Authors:  José M Pereira; Maria Vieira; Sérgio M Santos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Design of Protein Multi-specificity Using an Independent Sequence Search Reduces the Barrier to Low Energy Sequences.

Authors:  Alexander M Sevy; Tim M Jacobs; James E Crowe; Jens Meiler
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.