Literature DB >> 24173995

Patient satisfaction following augmentation mammaplasty with the gel prosthesis.

G P Hetter1.   

Abstract

No evaluation of patient responses to augmentation mammaplasty has been published in the medical literature. This has left the area open for opinion and speculation by both physicians and laity.All patients undergoing pure augmentation mammaplasty during 1976 were sought in four plastic surgery practices using gel prostheses in the Southwest. Responses were obtained from 159 of the 221 patients (72%). Some degree of firmness of one or both breasts was reported by 64% of the patients who responded. External capsulotomy was effective in only 1 patient in 5. Shape distortion because of capsular contracture was reported by 10% of patients. Change in nipple sensation was reported by 42% of patients; 9% found it bothersome. There was no difference statistically between the inframammary and periareolar approach. Improved self-image was reported by 91% of patients. Fifty-five percent reported a positive effect on their sexual lives. Only 3% had a negative effect.Although 91% of patients expressed satisfaction with their operations, an even greater number (97%) would have the operation again. This is a striking affirmation of this cosmetic operation as performed by board-certified plastic surgeons. Obviously, the benefits of augmentation mammaplasty outweigh any unfavorable results.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 24173995     DOI: 10.1007/BF01577861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  12 in total

1.  Personality characteristics of women seeking breast augmentation. Comparison to small-busted and average-busted controls.

Authors:  R H Shipley; J M O'Donnell; K F Bader
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Closed compression technique for rupturing a contracted capsule around a breast implant.

Authors:  J L Baker; R J Bartels; W M Douglas
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery.

Authors:  E H Courtiss; R M Goldwyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Influence of some operative and postoperative factors on capsular contracture around breast prostheses.

Authors:  C J Hipps; R Raju; R E Straith
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Selection of alternatives in augmentation mammaplasty.

Authors:  E H Courtiss; R C Webster; M F White
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The use of inflatable breast implants.

Authors:  T D Rees; C L Guy; R J Coburn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Experiences with a large series of silastic breast implants.

Authors:  J E Williams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Partially submuscular breast augmentation.

Authors:  P Regnault
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Histological investigation of the etiology of capsule contracture following augmentation mammaplasty.

Authors:  E Domanskis; J Q Owsley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  The use of soluble steroids within inflatable breast prostheses.

Authors:  E R Perrin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improved patient satisfaction with augmentation mammoplasty: the transaxillary subpectoral approach.

Authors:  G P Hetter
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.326

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.