| Literature DB >> 24173087 |
Francesca Fantasia1, Emma Nora Di Capua, Natalia Cenfra, Gloria Pessina, Sergio Mecarocci, Angela Rago, Ettore Cotroneo, Anna Busanello, Francesco Equitani, Francesco Lo-Coco, Clara Nervi, Giuseppe Cimino.
Abstract
In Ph- myeloproliferative neoplasms, the quantification of the JAK2V617F transcripts may provide some advantages over the DNA allele burden determination. We developed a q-RT-PCR to assess the JAK2WT and JAK2V617F mRNA expression in 105 cases (23 donors, 13 secondary polycythemia, 22 polycythemia vera (PV), 38 essential thrombocythemia (ET), and 9 primary myelofibrosis (PMF)). Compared with the standard allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO)-PCR technique, our assay showed a 100 % concordance rate detecting the JAK2V617F mutation in 22/22 PV (100 %), 29/38 (76.3 %) ET, and 5/9 (55.5 %) PMF cases, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.01 %. Comparing DNA and RNA samples, we found that the JAK2V617F mutational ratios were significantly higher at the RNA level both in PV (p = 0.005) and ET (p = 0.001) samples. In PV patients, JAK2WT expression levels positively correlated with the platelets (PLTs) (p = 0.003) whereas a trend to negative correlation was observed with the Hb levels (p = 0.051). JAK2V617F-positive cases showed the lowest JAK2WT and ABL1 mRNA expression levels. In all the samples, the expression pattern of beta-glucoronidase (GUSB) was more homogeneous than that of ABL1 or β2 microglobulin (B2M). Using GUSB as normalizator gene, a significant increase of the JAK2V617F mRNA levels was seen in two ET patients at time of progression to PV. In conclusion, the proposed q-RT-PCR is a sensitive and accurate method to quantify the JAK2 mutational status that can also show clinical correlations suggesting the impact of the residual amount of the JAK2WT allele on the Ph- MPN disease phenotype. Our observations also preclude the use of ABL1 as a housekeeping gene for these neoplasms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24173087 PMCID: PMC3945640 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-013-1920-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673
The diagnostic main clinical–hematologic characteristics of the 105 individuals included in the present study grouped according to diagnosis
| Characteristics | Donors ( | SP ( | PV ( | ET ( | PMF ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAK2WT/V617F ( | JAK2WT/V617F ( | JAK2WT/V617F ( | |||||
Age, median (years) (range) | 45 (26–61) | 59 (27–90) | 65 (52–88) | 63 (35–80) | 62 (38–81) | 75 (70–80) | 68 (47–83) |
| Gender, male/female | 16/7 | 13/0 | 17/5 | 4/5 | 20/29 | 2/4 | 3/5 |
Hb (g/dl), median (range) | 15 (11.5–16.9) | 17 (16–18.2) | 18 (17.6–20.2) | 12.5 (11.6–14) | 15 (12–19) | 9.6 (8.9–10) | 15.4 (13.8–17.3) |
WBC (1 × 109/l), median (range) | 6.6 (4.7–9.3) | 7.1 (4.8–11.4) | 10.6 (4.4–15) | 8.5 (6–10) | 9.9 (7.1–18) | 8 (1.3–16.8) | 20.6 (20–10.8) |
PLTs (1 × 109/l), median (range) | 232 (192–349) | 200.5 (91–274) | 370 (75–712) | 792 (631–1,420) | 718 (256–1,318) | 364 (129–489) | 555 (197–946) |
Neutrophils (1 × 109/l), median (range) | 4.4 (1.4–7) | 4.6 (1.4–7.5) | 7.9 (2.7–13) | 4.6 (2.8–7.6) | 6 (1.4–13.5) | 5.1 (1–9.4) | 15.9 (8.4–19.5) |
median (range) | 7.7 (1.2–38.5) | 8.7 (2.5–30.9) | 6.9 (0.02–22.6) | 15.6 (6.2–34.5) | 6.0 (0.9–16.7) | 11.2 (3.8–18.5) | 3.0 (0.3–4.5) |
median (range) | – | – | 26.9 (0.2–203.6) | – | 6.9 (0.7–52.8) | – | 29.4 (1.4–78.7) |
median (range) | 4.6 (1.6–11.9) | 5.0 (2.4–20.6) | 2.9 (0.9–12.7) | 7.4 (1.8–17.7) | 3.8 (0.3–8.7) | 8.6 (4.6–14.9) | 3.3 (1.7–4.6) |
median (range)a | 8.0 (2.8–10.1) | 4.8 (2.5–13.0) | 8.8 (2.4–17.7) | 6.1 (2.4–7.9) | 8.1 (2.4–17.3) | 6.0 | 7.0 (2.3–13.4) |
median (range)a | 37.6 (7.4–53.2) | 34.5 (3.2–58.7) | 37.8 (0.2–56.7) | 39.8 (8.6–71.6) | 33.2 (5.8–59.1) | 23.4 | 41.0 (19.3–93.5) |
a B2M and GUSB copy numbers were detected in donor (n = 11), SP (n = 5), PV (n = 16), ET (WT n = 7; V617F n = 24), and PMF (WT n = 1; V617F n = 4) samples
Fig. 1JAK2WT and JAK2V617F mRNA expression levels detected by q-RT-PCR method. a JAK2WT absolute copy numbers, in donors, SP cases, and Ph− MPN patients. b JAK2V617F absolute copy numbers in JAK2V617F-positive Ph− MPN patients. Circles indicate the outlier values. Asterisks indicate the extreme values
Fig. 2JAK2V617F mutational burden ratio, calculated at the DNA and RNA levels. The circle indicates the outlier values
Fig. 3Correlations between the JAK2WT expression levels and PLT count (a) and Hb levels (b) in the PV patient group
Fig. 4a ABL-1 absolute copy numbers in donors, SP cases, and Ph− MPN patients grouped according to the presence/absence of the JAK2V617F mutation. Circles indicate the outlier values. The asterisks indicate the extreme values. b Correlation between the ABL-1 and JAK2WT expression levels in the JAK2V617F-positive Ph− MPN patient group
Fig. 5B2M (a) and GUSB (b) absolute copy numbers in donors, SP cases, and Ph− MPN patients grouped according to the presence/absence of the JAK2V617F mutation. The circle indicates the outlier values. The asterisks indicate the extreme values
The hematologic characteristics of the three ET patients who progressed to PV referred at the time of ET diagnosis and at PV progression (pPV)
| Characteristics | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | pPV | ET | pPV | ET | pPV | |
| WBC (1 × 109/l), median (range) | 9.9 | 26.2 | 7.1 | 12 | 9.2 | 10.69 |
| PLTs (1 × 109/l), median (range) | 696 | 1,003 | 1,184 | 1,500 | 519 | 516 |
| Neutrophils (1 × 109/l), median (range) | 7.5 | 21 | 5.6 | 7.6 | 5.4 | 6.73 |
|
| 5.8 ± 0.7 | 1 ± 0.01 | 5.4 ± 0.25 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.08 | 7.1 ± 1 |
|
| 1.3 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 10.2 ± 0.3 |
| DNA mutational burden ratio | 22 | 69 | 29.4 | 28 | 24 | 21 |
| mRNA mutational burden ratio | 18 | 85 | 32 | 49 | 56 | 59 |
|
| 1,751 ± 27 | 2,256 ± 500 | 1,974 ± 75 | 1,953 ± 71 | 1,376 ± 142 | 1,749 ± 163 |
|
| 15.5 ± 0.6 | 10.4 ± 1.1 | 15.6 ± 0.8 | 16.1 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.06 | 6.9 ± 0.2 |
Fig. 6The JAK2V617F mutational burden ratio in the three ET patients who progressed to PV evaluated by the following three different methods: a the absolute allele-specific PCR, b the present absolute allele-specific q-RT-PCR, and c using GUSB to normalize the values achieved by the present q-RT-PCR assay