Literature DB >> 24172871

Interactive effects of in utero nutrition and genetic inheritance on cognition: new evidence using sibling comparisons.

C Justin Cook1, Jason M Fletcher2.   

Abstract

A large literature links early environments and later outcomes, such as cognition; however, little is known about the mechanisms. One potential mechanism is sensitivity to early environments that is moderated or amplified by the genotype. With this mechanism in mind, a complementary literature outside economics examines the interaction between genes and environments, but often problems of endogeneity and bias in estimation are uncorrected. A key issue in the literature is exploring environmental variation that is not exogenous, which is potentially problematic if there are gene-environment correlation or gene-gene interactions. Using sibling pairs with genetic data in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study we extend a previous, and widely cited, gene-environment study that explores an interaction between the FADS2 gene, which is associated with the processing of essential fatty acids related to cognitive development, and early life nutrition in explaining later-life IQ. Our base OLS findings suggest that individuals with specific FADS2 variants gain roughly 0.15 standard deviations in IQ for each standard deviation increase in birth weight, our measure of the early nutrition environment; while, individuals with other variants of FADS2 do not have a statistically significant association with early nutrition, implying the genotype is influencing the effects of environmental exposure. When including family-level fixed effects, however, the magnitude of the gene-environment interaction is reduced by half and statistical significance dissipates, implying the interaction between FADS2 and early nutrition in explaining later life IQ may in part be due to unobserved, family-level factors. The example has wider implications for the practice of investigating gene-environment interactions when the environmental exposure is not exogenous and robustness to unobserved variation in the genome is not controlled for in the analysis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene–environment interaction; IQ; Nutrition; Sibling fixed effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24172871      PMCID: PMC3943815          DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  16 in total

Review 1.  Nature, nurture and socioeconomic policy-what can we learn from molecular genetics?

Authors:  Petter Lundborg; Anders Stenberg
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 2.184

2.  Twin differences in birth weight: the effects of genotype and prenatal environment on neonatal and post-neonatal mortality.

Authors:  Dalton Conley; Kate W Strully; Neil G Bennett
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  Genetic interactions with prenatal social environment: effects on academic and behavioral outcomes.

Authors:  Dalton Conley; Emily Rauscher
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2013-03

Review 4.  The history of infant nutrition.

Authors:  Silvia Diez Castilho; Antônio Azevedo Barros Filho
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.197

5.  Understanding the Mechanisms Through Which an Influential Early Childhood Program Boosted Adult Outcomes.

Authors:  James Heckman; Rodrigo Pinto; Peter Savelyev
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2013-10

6.  Effects of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation during pregnancy on gestational age and size at birth: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Mexico.

Authors:  Usha Ramakrishnan; Aryeh D Stein; Socorro Parra-Cabrera; Meng Wang; Beth Imhoff-Kunsch; Sergio Juárez-Márquez; Juan Rivera; Reynaldo Martorell
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.069

7.  Moderation of breastfeeding effects on the IQ by genetic variation in fatty acid metabolism.

Authors:  Avshalom Caspi; Benjamin Williams; Julia Kim-Cohen; Ian W Craig; Barry J Milne; Richie Poulton; Leonard C Schalkwyk; Alan Taylor; Helen Werts; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Investing in early human development: timing and economic efficiency.

Authors:  Orla Doyle; Colm P Harmon; James J Heckman; Richard E Tremblay
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.184

9.  Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and fetal growth.

Authors:  A A Leaf; M J Leighfield; K L Costeloe; M A Crawford
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  FADS2 polymorphisms modify the effect of breastfeeding on child IQ.

Authors:  Colin D Steer; George Davey Smith; Pauline M Emmett; Joseph R Hibbeln; Jean Golding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does education attenuate the genetic risk of obesity? Evidence from U.K. Twins.

Authors:  Vikesh Amin; Paul Dunn; Tim Spector
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.184

2.  Fetal growth and neurobehavioral outcomes in childhood.

Authors:  Pinka Chatterji; Kajal Lahiri; Dohyung Kim
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  Understanding heterogeneity in the effects of birth weight on adult cognition and wages.

Authors:  C Justin Cook; Jason M Fletcher
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Can education rescue genetic liability for cognitive decline?

Authors:  C Justin Cook; Jason M Fletcher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The Influence of Men's Military Service on Smoking Across the Life Course.

Authors:  Andrew S London; Pamela Herd; Richard A Miech; Janet M Wilmoth
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2016-11-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.