Literature DB >> 24172171

Comparison of 44-hour and fixed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in dialysis patients.

Wenjin Liu1, Hong Ye, Bing Tang, Zhiping Sun, Ping Wen, Wenhui Wu, Xueqing Bian, Xia Shen, Junwei Yang.   

Abstract

The two most commonly used strategies to evaluate dialysis patients' blood pressure (BP) level are 44-hour and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The objective of this study was to find an appropriate 24-hour period that correlated well with the 44-hour BP level and determine the differences between these strategies. In a group of 51 dialysis patients, the authors performed 44-hour ABPM and extracted data for a fixed 24-hour ABPM. The fixed 24-hour ABPM started at 6 am on the nondialysis day. A strong correlation was found between all parameters of 44-hour and the fixed 24-hour ABPM, with paired sample t test showing only small magnitude changes in a few parameters. Both 24-hour ABPM and 44-hour ABPM were superior to clinic BP in predicting left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by multiple regression analysis. It was found that 44-hour ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), but not 24-hour AASI, had a positive association with LVMI (r=0.328, P=.021). However, after adjustment for 44-hour systolic blood pressure, this association disappeared. Fixed 24-hour ABPM is a good surrogate of 44-hour ABPM to some extent, while 44-hour ABPM can provide more accurate and detailed information. ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24172171      PMCID: PMC8032109          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  22 in total

1.  SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE ESTIMATION, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE AUDITORY METHOD.

Authors:  J A Macwilliam; G S Melvin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1914-03-28

2.  Trended cosinor change model for analyzing hemodynamic rhythm patterns in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Ken Kelley; Robert P Light; Rajiv Agarwal
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Independent prognostic value of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index and aortic pulse wave velocity in a general population.

Authors:  T W Hansen; Y Li; J A Staessen; J Jeppesen; S Rasmussen; J-G Wang; L Thijs; H Ibsen; M E Safar; C Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Out-of-hemodialysis-unit blood pressure is a superior determinant of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Neva J Brim; Jothiharan Mahenthiran; Martin J Andersen; Chandan Saha
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Increased ambulatory arterial stiffness index is associated with target organ damage in primary hypertension.

Authors:  Giovanna Leoncini; Elena Ratto; Francesca Viazzi; Valentina Vaccaro; Angelica Parodi; Valeria Falqui; Novella Conti; Cinzia Tomolillo; Giacomo Deferrari; Roberto Pontremoli
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in chronic and end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  A M Thompson; T G Pickering
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Relationship of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data to echocardiographic findings in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  S Ertürk; A E Ertuğ; K Ateş; N Duman; S M Aslan; G Nergisoğlu; E Diker; C Erol; O Karatan; B Erbay
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Prognostic value of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and of night/day ratio in nondiabetic, cardiovascular events-free hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Tripepi; Riccardo Maria Fagugli; Pietro Dattolo; Giovanna Parlongo; Francesca Mallamaci; Umberto Buoncristiani; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

Authors:  G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Awake systolic blood pressure variability correlates with target-organ damage in hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  Alfonso Tatasciore; Giulia Renda; Marco Zimarino; Manola Soccio; Grzegorz Bilo; Gianfranco Parati; Giuseppe Schillaci; Raffaele De Caterina
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  J Rick Turner; Anthony J Viera; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Blood Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis: The CRIC Study (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort).

Authors:  Nisha Bansal; Charles E McCulloch; Feng Lin; Arnold Alper; Amanda H Anderson; Magda Cuevas; Alan S Go; Radhakrishna Kallem; John W Kusek; Claudia M Lora; Eva Lustigova; Akinlolu Ojo; Mahboob Rahman; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson Wright; Dawei Xie; Chi-Yuan Hsu
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Association of betaine with blood pressure in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Lulu Wang; Mingming Zhao; Wenjin Liu; Xiurong Li; Hong Chu; Youwei Bai; Zhuxing Sun; Chaoqing Gao; Lemin Zheng; Junwei Yang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Poor agreement between dialysis unit blood pressure and interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Wenjin Liu; Jing Niu; Chunsun Dai; Junwei Yang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Comparative analysis of visit and home blood pressure in a pilot trial on the effect of 18% sodium substitute salt on blood pressure.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Huakun Rao; Meixian Wang; Huini Xu; Wen Wang; Ge Li; Hao Wang; Lihong Mu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.