Literature DB >> 24171990

Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions.

Leila Shafiei1, Parinaz Mojiri, Yalda Ghahraman, Vahid Rakhshan.   

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of Class V restorations filled with a 7th-generation self-adhesive composite.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 40 permanent premolars and 80 primary canines, 160 Class V cavities were prepared, which were filled with four restorative materials (n of each material=20 permanent and 20 primary restorations): control: nonbonded composite (Heliomolar), GI: glass ionomer (Fuji IX GP), BC: bonded Heliomolar, SC: self-adhesive composite (Embrace WetBond). Dye penetration was scored 0 to 4 at 160 coronal and 160 gingival margins under 40× magnification by two examiners. The data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test (α=0.01).
RESULTS: The mean microleakages of the materials (in the order of 'control, GI, BC, SC') at each margin-dentition (n=20 margins) were: coronal-permanent (3.25±0.72, 2.75±0.72, 0.35±0.59, 2.7±0.73), coronal-primary (3.3±0.66, 2.85±0.88, 0.55±0.76, 2.65±1.14), gingival-permanent (3.35±0.67, 0.85±0.67, 2.95±0.83, 1.55±1.23), and gingival-primary (3.25±0.72, 0.85±0.59, 2.85±0.89, 2.85±0.93). Compared with the control microleakage at each margin-dentition (each group's n=20 margins), BC microleakage was significantly lesser at coronal margins only (p=0.000), GI microleakage was lower at gingival margins only (p=0.000), and SC microleakage was smaller at gingival margins of permanent teeth only (p=0.000). After combining coronal/gingival margins, only SC microleakage in primary dentition (n=40 margins) was not significantly lesser than the control in primary teeth (p=0.018); and microleakage of all other material-dentitions were lesser than corresponding control-dentitions (p=0.000). Permanent and primary teeth had similar results for all material-margins (p>0.5) except for SC at gingival margins (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: SC should be used only at gingival margins of permanent teeth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Application of self-adhesive composite should be limited to gingival margins of permanent teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24171990     DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract        ISSN: 1526-3711


  5 in total

1.  The effects of light curing units and environmental temperatures on C = C conversion of commercial and experimental bonding agents.

Authors:  Tahereh Sadat Jafarzadeh-Kashi; Mohmmad Erfan; Salmeh Kalbasi; Malihe Ghadiri; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2014-08-06

2.  The effects of dentin bonding agent formulas on their polymerization quality, and together with tooth tissues on their microleakage and shear bond strength: an explorative 3-step experiment.

Authors:  Mohmmad Erfan; Tahereh Sadat Jafarzadeh-Kashi; Malihe Ghadiri; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Effects of ethanol concentrations of acrylate-based dental adhesives on microtensile composite-dentin bond strength and hybrid layer structure of a 10 wt% polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-incorporated bonding agent.

Authors:  Seyed Mostafa Mousavinasab; Mohammad Atai; Mehrdad Barekatain; Parisa Fattahi; Amir Fattahi; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

4.  In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.

Authors:  Sara Arastoo; Azam Behbudi; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-01-20

5.  Microleakage of Aesthetic Restorations Following Functional Simulation and Immersion in Saudi-Traditional Mouth Rinses.

Authors:  Mohammed A Alqarni; Khalid M Abdelaziz; Omar Saeed Al Shahrani; Ahmed Abdullah Al Asmari; Saad Ali Sabrah; Mohammed Thamer Al Qahtani
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.