Mieke Faber1, Sunette Laurie2, Mamokhele Maduna3, Thokozile Magudulela3, Ellen Muehlhoff4. 1. 1 Nutritional Intervention Research Unit, Medical Research Council, PO Box 19070, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa. 2. 2 Agricultural Research Council - Roodeplaat Vegetable and Ornamental Plant Institute, Pretoria, South Africa. 3. 3 Department of Basic Education, National School Nutrition Programme Directorate (Sustainable Food Production in Schools (SFPS) and Nutrition Education), Pretoria, South Africa. 4. 4 Nutrition Education and Consumer Awareness Group, Nutrition Division, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the school food environment in terms of breakfast consumption, school meals, learners' lunch box, school vending and classroom activities related to nutrition. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Ninety purposively selected poorly resourced schools in South Africa. SUBJECTS: Questionnaires were completed by school principals (n 85), school feeding coordinators (n 77), food handlers (n 84), educators (n 687), randomly selected grade 5 to 7 learners (n 2547) and a convenience sample of parents (n 731). The school menu (n 75), meal served on the survey day, and foods at tuck shops and food vendors (n 74) were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two per cent of learners had not eaten breakfast; 24 % brought a lunch box, mostly with bread. Vegetables (61 %) were more often on the school menu than fruit (28 %) and were served in 41 % of schools on the survey day compared with 4 % serving fruit. Fifty-seven per cent of learners brought money to school. Parents advised learners to buy fruit (37 %) and healthy foods (23 %). Tuck shops and vendors sold mostly unhealthy foods. Lack of money/poverty (74 %) and high food prices (68 %) were major challenges for healthy eating. Most (83 %) educators showed interest in nutrition, but only 15 % had received training in nutrition. Eighty-one per cent of educators taught nutrition as part of school subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The school food environment has large scope for improvement towards promoting healthy eating. This includes increasing access to vegetables and fruit, encouraging learners to carry a healthy lunch box, and regulating foods sold through tuck shops and food vendors.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the school food environment in terms of breakfast consumption, school meals, learners' lunch box, school vending and classroom activities related to nutrition. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Ninety purposively selected poorly resourced schools in South Africa. SUBJECTS: Questionnaires were completed by school principals (n 85), school feeding coordinators (n 77), food handlers (n 84), educators (n 687), randomly selected grade 5 to 7 learners (n 2547) and a convenience sample of parents (n 731). The school menu (n 75), meal served on the survey day, and foods at tuck shops and food vendors (n 74) were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two per cent of learners had not eaten breakfast; 24 % brought a lunch box, mostly with bread. Vegetables (61 %) were more often on the school menu than fruit (28 %) and were served in 41 % of schools on the survey day compared with 4 % serving fruit. Fifty-seven per cent of learners brought money to school. Parents advised learners to buy fruit (37 %) and healthy foods (23 %). Tuck shops and vendors sold mostly unhealthy foods. Lack of money/poverty (74 %) and high food prices (68 %) were major challenges for healthy eating. Most (83 %) educators showed interest in nutrition, but only 15 % had received training in nutrition. Eighty-one per cent of educators taught nutrition as part of school subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The school food environment has large scope for improvement towards promoting healthy eating. This includes increasing access to vegetables and fruit, encouraging learners to carry a healthy lunch box, and regulating foods sold through tuck shops and food vendors.
Authors: Siobhan O'Halloran; Gabriel Eksteen; Mekdes Gebremariam; Laura Alston Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nasrin Omidvar; Mina Babashahi; Zahra Abdollahi; Ayoub Al-Jawaldeh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nelia P Steyn; Johanna H Nel; Linda Drummond; Sonia Malczyk; Marjanne Senekal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Constance Awuor Gewa; Agatha Christine Onyango; Rose Okoyo Opiyo; Lawrence Cheskin; Joel Gittelsohn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alice P Okeyo; Eunice Seekoe; Anniza de Villiers; Mieke Faber; Johanna H Nel; Nelia P Steyn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 3.390