Literature DB >> 24171480

Replication, repair, and translesion polymerase bypass of N⁶-oxopropenyl-2'-deoxyadenosine.

Leena Maddukuri1, Sarah C Shuck, Robert L Eoff, Linlin Zhao, Carmelo J Rizzo, F Peter Guengerich, Lawrence J Marnett.   

Abstract

The oxidative stress products malondialdehyde and base propenal react with DNA bases forming the adduction products 3-(2'-deoxy-β-D-erythro-pentofuranosyl)pyrimido[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one (M1dG) and N(6)-(oxypropenyl)-2'-deoxyadenosine (OPdA). M1dG is mutagenic in vivo and miscodes in vitro, but little work has been done on OPdA. To improve our understanding of the effect of OPdA on polymerase activity and mutagenicity, we evaluated the ability of the translesion DNA polymerases hPols η, κ, and ι to bypass OPdA in vitro. hPols η and κ inserted dNTPs opposite the lesion and extended the OPdA-modified primer to the terminus. hPol ι inserted dNTPs opposite OPdA but failed to fully extend the primer. Steady-state kinetic analysis indicated that these polymerases preferentially insert dTTP opposite OPdA, although less efficiently than opposite dA. Minimal incorrect base insertion was observed for all polymerases, and dCTP was the primary mis-insertion event. Examining replicative and repair polymerases revealed little effect of OPdA on the Sulfolobus solfataricus polymerase Dpo1 or the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. Bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase displayed a reduced level of OPdA bypass compared to unmodified DNA, and OPdA nearly completely blocked the activity of base excision repair polymerase hPol β. This work demonstrates that bypass of OPdA is generally error-free, modestly decreases the catalytic activity of most polymerases, and blocks hPol β polymerase activity. Although mis-insertion opposite OPdA is relatively weak, the efficiency of bypass may introduce A → G transitions observed in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24171480      PMCID: PMC3925671          DOI: 10.1021/bi401103k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  34 in total

1.  The Y-family of DNA polymerases.

Authors:  H Ohmori; E C Friedberg; R P Fuchs; M F Goodman; F Hanaoka; D Hinkle; T A Kunkel; C W Lawrence; Z Livneh; T Nohmi; L Prakash; S Prakash; T Todo; G C Walker; Z Wang; R Woodgate
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Eukaryotic DNA polymerases: proposal for a revised nomenclature.

Authors:  P M Burgers; E V Koonin; E Bruford; L Blanco; K C Burtis; M F Christman; W C Copeland; E C Friedberg; F Hanaoka; D C Hinkle; C W Lawrence; M Nakanishi; H Ohmori; L Prakash; S Prakash; C A Reynaud; A Sugino; T Todo; Z Wang; J C Weill; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 4.  Endogenous generation of reactive oxidants and electrophiles and their reactions with DNA and protein.

Authors:  Lawrence J Marnett; James N Riggins; James D West
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Replication of damaged DNA in mammalian cells: new solutions to an old problem.

Authors:  Alan R Lehmann
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-11-30       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Oxyradicals and DNA damage.

Authors:  L J Marnett
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Duplex DNA catalyzes the chemical rearrangement of a malondialdehyde deoxyguanosine adduct.

Authors:  H Mao; N C Schnetz-Boutaud; J P Weisenseel; L J Marnett; M P Stone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Misincorporation and stalling at O(6)-methylguanine and O(6)-benzylguanine: evidence for inactive polymerase complexes.

Authors:  Adrienne M Woodside; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  In vitro bypass of malondialdehyde-deoxyguanosine adducts: differential base selection during extension by the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I is the critical determinant of replication outcome.

Authors:  Muhammed F Hashim; James N Riggins; Nathalie Schnetz-Boutaud; Markus Voehler; Michael P Stone; Lawrence J Marnett
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Analysis of the effect of bulk at N2-alkylguanine DNA adducts on catalytic efficiency and fidelity of the processive DNA polymerases bacteriophage T7 exonuclease- and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Jeong-Yun Choi; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  4 in total

1.  Formation of S-[2-(N6-Deoxyadenosinyl)ethyl]glutathione in DNA and Replication Past the Adduct by Translesion DNA Polymerases.

Authors:  Carl A Sedgeman; Yan Su; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  Methylglyoxal and Its Adducts: Induction, Repair, and Association with Disease.

Authors:  Seigmund Wai Tsuen Lai; Edwin De Jesus Lopez Gonzalez; Tala Zoukari; Priscilla Ki; Sarah C Shuck
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.973

3.  Protein modification by adenine propenal.

Authors:  Sarah C Shuck; Orrette R Wauchope; Kristie L Rose; Philip J Kingsley; Carol A Rouzer; Steven M Shell; Norie Sugitani; Walter J Chazin; Irene Zagol-Ikapitte; Olivier Boutaud; John A Oates; James J Galligan; William N Beavers; Lawrence J Marnett
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Enzymatic bypass of an N6-deoxyadenosine DNA-ethylene dibromide-peptide crosslink by translesion DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Pratibha P Ghodke; Gabriela Gonzalez-Vasquez; Hui Wang; Kevin M Johnson; Carl A Sedgeman; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.