Literature DB >> 24171458

Investigation of hepatobiliary disposition of doxorubicin following intrahepatic delivery of different dosage forms.

Elsa Lilienberg1, Charlotte Ebeling Barbier, Rickard Nyman, Mikael Hedeland, Ulf Bondesson, Niklas Axén, Hans Lennernäs.   

Abstract

Unresectable, intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often treated palliatively in humans by doxorubicin (DOX). The drug is administered either as a drug-emulsified-in-Lipiodol (DLIP) or as drug loaded into drug eluting beads (DEB), and both formulations are administered intrahepatically. However, several aspects of their in vivo performance in the liver are still not well-understood. In this study, DLIP and DEB were investigated regarding the local and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of DOX and its primary metabolite doxorubicinol (DOXol). An advanced PK-multisampling site acute in vivo pig model was used for simultaneous sampling in the portal, hepatic, and femoral veins and the bile duct. The study had a randomized, parallel design with four treatment groups (TI-TIV). TI (n = 4) was used as control and received an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of DOX as a solution. TII and TIII were given a local injection in the hepatic artery with DLIP (n = 4) or DEB (n = 4), respectively. TIV (n = 2) received local injections of DLIP in the hepatic artery and bile duct simultaneously. All samples were analyzed for concentrations of DOX and DOXol with UPLC-MS/MS. Compared to DLIP, the systemic exposure for DOX with DEB was reduced (p < 0.05), in agreement with a slower in vivo release. The approximated intracellular bioavailability of DOX during 6 h appeared to be lower for DEB than DLIP. Following i.v. infusion (55 min), DOX had a liver extraction of 41 (28-53)%, and the fraction of the dose eliminated in bile of DOX and DOXol was 20 (15-22)% and 4.2 (3.2-5.2)%, respectively. The AUCbile/AUCVP for DOX and DOXol was 640 (580-660) and 5000 (3900-5400), respectively. In conclusion, DLIP might initially deliver a higher hepatocellular concentration of DOX than DEB as a consequence of its higher in vivo release rate. Thus, DLIP delivery results in higher intracellular peak concentrations that might correlate with better anticancer effects, but also higher systemic drug exposure and safety issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24171458     DOI: 10.1021/mp4002574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bench-to-clinic development of imageable drug-eluting embolization beads: finding the balance.

Authors:  Andrew L Lewis; Sean L Willis; Matthew R Dreher; Yiqing Tang; Koorosh Ashrafi; Bradford J Wood; Elliot B Levy; Karun V Sharma; Ayele H Negussie; Andrew S Mikhail
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Novel mouse models of hepatic artery infusion.

Authors:  Minhyung Kim; Daniel T Fisher; Colin A Powers; Emmanuel M Gabriel; Alexis M Korman; Sandra Sexton; Andrei V Gudkov; Joseph J Skitzki
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Porcine and Human In Vivo Simulations for Doxorubicin-Containing Formulations Used in Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment.

Authors:  Ilse R Dubbelboer; Erik Sjögren; Hans Lennernäs
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Evaluation of novel formulations for transarterial chemoembolization: combining elements of Lipiodol emulsions with Drug-eluting Beads.

Authors:  Marcus Caine; Ting Chung; Hugh Kilpatrick; Zainab Bascal; Sean Willis; Yiqing Tang; Thierry de Baere; Matthew Dreher; Andrew Lewis
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 5.  Limitations and Possibilities of Transarterial Chemotherapeutic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Charlotte Ebeling Barbier; Femke Heindryckx; Hans Lennernäs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  A Synthetic Aptamer-Drug Adduct for Targeted Liver Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Thu Le Trinh; Guizhi Zhu; Xilin Xiao; William Puszyk; Kwame Sefah; Qunfeng Wu; Weihong Tan; Chen Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Substitution of Percutaneous Ethanol Injection with a Low Molecular Weight Peptide Gel Mimicking Chemoembolization for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Long Xu; Yan Liang; Changzheng Sun; Na Hao; Jianqin Yan; Wenxia Gao; Bin He
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2017-07-06

8.  In situ real-time tracing of hierarchical targeting nanostructures in drug resistant tumors using diffuse fluorescence tomography.

Authors:  Qianqian Guo; Yangyun Wang; Limin Zhang; Peng Zhang; Yunjian Yu; Yanqi Zhang; Chaoxing Li; Shaoyi Jiang; Xinge Zhang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 9.825

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.