Literature DB >> 24170715

Measurement Invariance of Cognitive Abilities Across Ethnicity, Gender, and Time Among Older Americans.

A Nayena Blankson1, John J McArdle2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to test the invariance of the cognitive variables in the Health and Retirement Study/Asset Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old studies (HRS/AHEAD) across ethnicity, gender, and time.
METHOD: Analyses were conducted using a selected subsample of the HRS/AHEAD data set. The cognitive performance tests measuring episodic memory and mental status were used, and invariance of a two-factor structure was tested using confirmatory factor analyses and multilevel modeling for longitudinal data.
RESULTS: Results provided some support for "strict" factorial invariance of the episodic memory and mental status measures across ethnicity and gender. Further support of weak ("metric") measurement invariance was found across time. DISCUSSION: Results of the research further our understanding of invariance of the HRS/AHEAD cognitive ability measures. Further implications are discussed.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive aging; Group differences; Latent variable modeling; Measurement invariance; Structural equation modeling.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24170715      PMCID: PMC4542644          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbt106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  14 in total

1.  Race differences in cognitive functioning among older adults.

Authors:  B A Zsembik; M K Peek
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Education, wealth, and cognitive function in later life.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cagney; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Assessing the measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale across immigrant and non-immigrant women in the postpartum period.

Authors:  Ryan J Van Lieshout; Kristin Cleverley; Jennifer M Jenkins; Katholiki Georgiades
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Racial bias in the assessment of cognitive functioning of older adults.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.658

5.  A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research.

Authors:  J L Horn; J J McArdle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1992 Autumn-Winter       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  Disparities among older adults in measures of cognitive function by race or ethnicity.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Jingshu Wang
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; Emily C Johnson; Phillip W Braddy
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2008-05

8.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Factorial Invariance within Longitudinal Structural Equation Models: Measuring the Same Construct across Time.

Authors:  Keith F Widaman; Emilio Ferrer; Rand D Conger
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2010-04-01

10.  Measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in diverse older persons.

Authors:  Dan Mungas; Keith F Widaman; Bruce R Reed; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.

Authors:  S L Solimeo; V-T T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Different Context but Similar Cognitive Structures: Older Adults in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Ola Sternäng; Martin Lövdén; Zarina N Kabir; Jena D Hamadani; Åke Wahlin
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2016-06

3.  The roles of executive functioning, simple attention, and medial temporal lobes in early learning, late learning, and delayed recall.

Authors:  Samantha E John; Aaron Ritter; Christina Wong; Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2021-12-17

4.  Examination of the Factor Structure of a Global Cognitive Function Battery across Race and Time.

Authors:  Lisa L Barnes; Futoshi Yumoto; Ana Capuano; Robert S Wilson; David A Bennett; Rochelle E Tractenberg
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Altruistic Attitudes Among Older Adults: Examining Construct Validity and Measurement Invariance of a New Scale.

Authors:  Tirth R Bhatta; Eva Kahana; Nirmala Lekhak; Boaz Kahana; Elizabeth Midlarsky
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2020-11-27

6.  Longitudinal measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in a diverse sample from the ELSA-Brasil study.

Authors:  Laiss Bertola; Isabela M Benseñor; Alden L Gross; Paulo Caramelli; Sandhi Maria Barreto; Arlinda B Moreno; Rosane H Griep; Maria Carmen Viana; Paulo A Lotufo; Claudia K Suemoto
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.697

7.  The Uniform Dataset 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery: Factor Structure, Invariance Testing, and Demographically Adjusted Factor Score Calculation.

Authors:  Andrew M Kiselica; Troy A Webber; Jared F Benge
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.114

8.  An application of Bayesian measurement invariance to modelling cognition over time in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Authors:  Benjamin David Williams; Tarani Chandola; Neil Pendleton
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.035

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.