Literature DB >> 24170441

[The efficiency of one-to-one support during labour - a literature analysis].

N Knape1, W Schnepp, A Krahl, F Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein.   

Abstract

Today, the way and the intensity of labour support differ internationally because of traditions, cultural background, legislation and finance issues. Moreover, the aspects of -labour support have changed in industrialized countries due to the transition from home birth to hospital birth. Technical aspects and surveillance have become more important. The increasing workload in hospitals (IQWIG 2006) as well as increasing Cesarean section rates and epidural rates are well documented (AQUA 2011). One reason for these changes might be a lack of support during childbirth. International studies emphasise the importance for continuous support in labour (Hodnett et al. 2011). This paper adds a German perspective on one-to-one-care and discusses how the results from international studies can be transferred into the German midwifery context.A literature search was conducted in 12/2012.One-to-one care seems to be effective for decreasing intervention rates. Results of international studies demonstrate differences in settings, supporting persons and defining one-to-one care and impede that the right conclusions can be drawn for the German context. -Especially the effect of midwifery presence in the German context isn't conducted sufficiently.Professional care and trusting emotional support incorporated by one person seems to be the best way to deliver one-to-one care and to avoid fragmentation of care. Organisational barriers should be dismantled to realize this aim.National Research is needed to evaluate the effects of one-to-one care by midwives. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24170441     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1355382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol        ISSN: 0948-2393            Impact factor:   0.685


  4 in total

1.  Peripartal pain perception and pain therapy: introduction and validation of a questionnaire as a quality instrument.

Authors:  A Linzbach; D Nitschke; J Rothaug; M Komann; C Weinmann; E Schleußner; W Meißner; J Jimenez Cruz; U Schneider
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Meghan A Bohren; Blair O Berger; Heather Munthe-Kaas; Özge Tunçalp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-18

3.  Quality assessment of peripartum care.

Authors:  Farahnaz Changaee; Masoumeh Simbar; Alireza Irajpour; Soheyla Akbari
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 0.611

4.  Quality of perinatal care for women with high-risk pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.

Authors:  Solmaz Mohammadi; Kobra Shojaei; Elham Maraghi; Zahra Motaghi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.