Literature DB >> 24170358

Impact of swine reproductive technologies on pig and global food production.

Robert V Knox1.   

Abstract

Reproductive technologies have dramatically changed the way pigs are raised for pork production in developed and developing countries. This has involved such areas as pigs produced/sow, more consistent pig flow to market, pig growth rate and feed efficiency, carcass yield and quality, labor efficiency, and pig health. Some reproductive technologies are in widespread use for commercial pork operations [Riesenbeck, Reprod Domest Anim 46:1-3, 2011] while others are in limited use in specific segments of the industry [Knox, Reprod Domest Anim 46:4-6, 2011]. Significant changes in the efficiency of pork production have occurred as a direct result of the use of reproductive technologies that were intended to improve the transfer of genes important for food production [Gerrits et al., Theriogenology 63:283-299, 2005]. While some technologies focused on the efficiency of gene transfer, others addressed fertility and labor issues. Among livestock species, pig reproductive efficiency appears to have achieved exceptionally high rates of performance (PigCHAMP 2011) [Benchmark 2011, Ames, IA, 12-16]. From the maternal side, this includes pigs born per litter, farrowing rate, as well as litters per sow per year. On the male side, boar fertility, sperm production, and sows served per sire have improved as well [Knox et al., Theriogenology, 70:1202-1208, 2008]. These shifts in the efficiency of swine fertility have resulted in the modern pig as one of the most efficient livestock species for global food production. These reproductive changes have predominantly occurred in developed countries, but data suggests transfer and adoption of these in developing countries as well (FAO STAT 2009; FAS 2006) [World pig meat production: food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, 2009; FAS, 2006) Worldwide Pork Production, 2006]. Technological advancements in swine reproduction have had profound effects on industry structure, production, efficiency, quality, and profitability. In all cases, the adoption of these technologies has aided in the creation of a sustainable supply of safe and affordable pork for consumers around the world [den Hartog, Adv Pork Prod 15:17-24, 2004].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24170358     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8887-3_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  12 in total

1.  CircRNAs in Xiang pig ovaries among diestrus and estrus stages.

Authors:  Xi Niu; Yali Huang; Huan Lu; Sheng Li; Shihui Huang; Xueqin Ran; Jiafu Wang
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  The relationship between mitochondrial DNA haplotype and the reproductive capacity of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Te-Sha Tsai; Sriram Rajasekar; Justin C St John
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Productivity analysis of 70 farrow-to-finish swine farms in Japan from 2013 to 2018.

Authors:  Shun Ogura; Hisanori Yamazaki; Katsumasa Kure; Itsuro Yamane
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 1.105

Review 4.  Current strategies for reproductive management of gilts and sows in North America.

Authors:  Robert R Kraeling; Stephen K Webel
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-31

5.  Associations between testicular development and fetal size in the pig.

Authors:  Claire Stenhouse; Yennifer Cortes-Araya; F Xavier Donadeu; Cheryl J Ashworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Osteopontin enhances sperm capacitation and in vitro fertilization efficiency in boars.

Authors:  Yun Chen; Kai Wang; Shouquan Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-31

7.  Identification and annotation of conserved promoters and macrophage-expressed genes in the pig genome.

Authors:  Christelle Robert; Ronan Kapetanovic; Dario Beraldi; Mick Watson; Alan L Archibald; David A Hume
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Ovarian Follicle Growth during Lactation Determines the Reproductive Performance of Weaned Sows.

Authors:  Tania P Lopes; Lorena Padilla; Alfonso Bolarin; Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez; Jordi Roca
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  High-performing farms exploit reproductive potential of high and low prolific sows better than low-performing farms.

Authors:  Satomi Tani; Carlos Piñeiro; Yuzo Koketsu
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-07-16

10.  Effect of the EM Bokashi® Multimicrobial Probiotic Preparation on the Non-specific Immune Response in Pigs.

Authors:  Ewa Laskowska; Łukasz Sebastian Jarosz; Zbigniew Grądzki
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.